The Enforcement Directorate conducted searches on premises linked to an NGO run by climate activist Harjeet Singh and his wife.

The probe relates to foreign inward remittances exceeding ₹6 crore, allegedly received in the guise of consultancy fees, triggering an investigation under FEMA.

The Money Trail

• Period under review: 2021–2025
• Foreign funds received: ₹6+ crore
• Recipient entity: Satat Sampada Pvt Ltd (SSPL)
• Stated purpose: Consultancy / sustainability-related activities

ED alleges the funds were used to influence energy policy narratives in India, linked to international climate advocacy groups.

Key Financial & Compliance Issues

The scrutiny hinges on:

• End-use of foreign funds vs stated purpose
• Substance over form in consultancy arrangements
• FEMA compliance on:
  • Nature of services
  • Valuation of consideration
  • Alignment with remitter disclosures abroad

Even compliant inflows can attract action if purpose and usage diverge.

What This Signals for NGOs & Private Entities

This case reinforces three realities:

• Foreign funding is no longer a disclosure-only issue
• Narrative, advocacy, and consultancy lines are being closely examined
• Documentation, pricing rationale, and activity linkage matter as much as receipts

Governance gaps, not just intent, create exposure.

Bottom Line

This is not about climate advocacy alone.

It is about whether foreign funds were received, reported, and utilised strictly within FEMA boundaries.

For NGOs and advisory entities:
Transparency is no longer defensive compliance — it is operational necessity.