NATIONAL AVIATION CO OF INDIA LTD ( AIR INDIA LTD), MUMBAI

Direct Tax
Indirect Tax
Corporate Law

Services
Consultation
Templates
Notice Board
Plans

Direct Tax

|

Judgements
Blogs
Judges
Notice Board
Briefcase AI

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com

+91 97234 00220

Direct Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Indirect Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Corporate Law

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Direct Tax

|

Judgements
Blogs
Judges
Notice Board
Briefcase AI

For any queries, concerns or feedback, please connect with us at:

contact@counselvise.com

+91 97234 00220

Direct Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Indirect Tax

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

Corporate Law

Judges
Assessee
Blogs
Judgements

NATIONAL AVIATION CO OF INDIA LTD ( AIR INDIA LTD), MUMBAI

Type: CompanyPAN: AACCN6194P

In Favor of

Filters

Clear all

Appeal Type

Income Tax Appeal

1

Court

TRIBUNAL

1

Assessment Year

2005-2006

1

Bench

Mumbai

1

Bench with Courts

Mumbai - Tribunal

1

Judges

NABIN KUMAR PRADHAN

1

MAHAVIR SINGH

1

Keywords

Capital expenditure

1

Change of opinion

1

Difference of opinion

1

Reassessment proceedings

1

Revenue expenditure

1

Result in favour of

Assessee

1

Sections

143(3)

1

148

1

154

1

2

1

5(2)

1

Year Of Pronouncement

2017

1

Judge With Court

Nabin Kumar Pradhan - Tribunal

1

Mahavir Singh - Tribunal

1

Sort By

Showing results 1-1 out of top 1 results

NATIONAL AVIATION CO OF INDIA LTD ( AIR INDIA LTD), MUMBAI V. DCIT 5(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2185/MUM/2012

2005-2006

Pronouncement Date: -

Result: Assessee

Mumbai

Difference of opinionchange of opinionrevenue expenditurereassessment proceedingscapital expenditure

143(3)5(2)1481542

4

Previous
1
Next

Direct Tax

Direct Tax

Indirect Tax

Corporate Law

Other Links

Direct Tax

Direct Tax

Indirect Tax

Corporate Law

Other Links

NATIONAL AVIATION CO OF INDIA LTD ( AIR INDIA LTD), MUMBAI

Filters

NATIONAL AVIATION CO OF INDIA LTD ( AIR INDIA LTD), MUMBAI V. DCIT 5(2), MUMBAI