ADITYA VIVEK VAIDYA,MUMBAI V. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-34(1)(1), MUMBAI

SA 139/MUM/2026

AI Insights

The case involves Aditya Vivek Vaidya, the applicant, who filed stay applications concerning the recovery of demands for the Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2019-20. During the hearing, the counsel for the assessee opted not to press for a stay but requested an early hearing of the appeals, which was supported by the Departmental Representative. The Tribunal decided not to grant the stay but scheduled an early hearing for the appeals.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 896644 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Stay Application
• Pronouncement Date: 09-10-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2026
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 07-09-2026
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJIV TEJA
• Keywords: Application of stay
• Section: 139; 2

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VP AND SHRI G. M. DOSS, AM SA Nos.139 & 140/Mum/2026 (Arising out of ITA Nos. 8747 & 8748/Mum/2016) (Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Aditya Vivek Vaidya 27/G Laxmi Ind. Estate, New Link Road, Andheri (W) Mumbai-400 052 Vs. ITO Ward 34(1)(1) Mumbai PAN/GIR No. AFIPV 6856 N (Applicant) : (Respondent) Applicant by : Shri Mahaveer Jain & Ms. Mansvi Singh Respondent by : Shri Rajiv Teja, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 09.10.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 09.10.2026 O R D E R The captioned stay applications have been filed by the assessee/applicant seeking stay on recovery of demands, pertaining to the Assessment Years (A.Y. for short) 2018-19 and 2019-20. 2. At the time of hearing, ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee did not press for stay and submitted that an early hearing of the appeals would suffice. 3. Learned Departmental Representative has no objection for early hearing of the appeals. 4. In view of the aforesaid, while we decline to grant stay on recovery of outstanding demand, howyever, acceding to assessee’s request for early hearing of the appeals, we direct the Registry to fix the appeals for hearing on 28.10.2026. Paper books, if any, must Printed from counselvise.com 2 SA No. 139 & 140/Mum/2026 2018-19 & 2019-20 Aditya Vivek Vaidya be filed sufficiently ahead of the date of hearing. The department is requested not to seek any adjournment, keeping in view the submission of ld. Counsel for assessee that the issues arising in the appeal are squarely covered. 5. In the result, stay applications are partly allowed in the terms indicated above. Order pronounced in the open court on 09.10.2026. Sd/- Sd/- (G M Doss) (Saktijit Dey) Accountant Member Vice President Mumbai; Dated : Roshani, Sr. PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT - concerned 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard File BY ORDER, (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai Sr. No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Order dictated on 09.10.26 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft Placed before author 09.10.26 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member Sr.PS/PS 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member JM/AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS JM/AM 6 Order pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 8 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which file goes to the AR 10 Date of Dispatch of order Printed from counselvise.com ABHINAV ANANT GAVANDE Digitally signed by ABHINAV ANANT GAVANDE Date: 2026.10.14 10:55:32 +05'30' "