AMRIT LAL, NAWANSHAHR,NAWANSHAHR V. JAO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, JALANDAHR, JALANDHAR

ITA 961/ASR/2025

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Amrit Lal against the order of the CIT(A) which confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2023-24. The primary contention was the lack of adequate opportunity given to the assessee to present his case, both at the assessment and appellate stages. The assessee argued that the orders were passed ex-parte without proper consideration of the submissions made. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, considering the principles of natural justice, decided to remand the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to fully present his case.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 838537 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2023-2024
• Appeal Filed On: 09-12-2025
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Set aside; Principle of natural justice

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR (PHYSICAL COURT) BEFORE SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 961/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 Amrit Lal, Vill. Mangupur, Teh. Balachaur, Nawanshahr, Punjab 144521 [PAN: ABZFA 0244N] (Appellant) Vs. JAO The D.C.I.T. Circle, Jalandhar (Respondent) Appellant by Respondent by : : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, A. R. Sh. Sunil Kumar Yadav, CIT-D. R. Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement : : 16.02.2026 17.02.2026 ORDER Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.: Appeal in this case has been filed against the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the ld. CIT(A) NFAC, Delhi for Assessment Year: 2023-24. 2. Grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are as under: Printed from counselvise.com 2 I.T.A. No. 961/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 “1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer, thereby, confirming the addition as made by the Assessing Officer and deciding the appeal of the assessee without affording any reasonable/sufficient opportunity. 2. That the passing of the order without giving adequate opportunity to the assessee is not proper because of the following facts: - 1). The first notice of hearing, dated 9.10.2025 was issued by the CIT(A) for 24.10.2025 and for which, the adjournment was sought and which is as per record of the CIT(A). ii). The 2nd notice of hearing, dated 13.11.2025 was issued, wherein, the date was given for 19.11.2025 and the assessee uploaded the submissions consisting of 1 to 15 pages alongwith Paper Book consisting of 1 to 298 pages. iii). That since the submissions could be uploaded and, as such, the appellant proceedings were pending as on 25.11.2025. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A) decided the appeal on 25.11.2025 without considering the submissions alongwith paper book as mentioned above, which have been uploaded on the same day and also that no sufficient opportunity have been afforded to the assessee concerned. 4. That even otherwise, no decision has been given by the CIT(A) on merits of the case and, thus, the order as passed by the Ld. CIT(A) deserves to be set aside. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally heard or disposed off.” Printed from counselvise.com 3 I.T.A. No. 961/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 3. At the very outset, the counsel of the assessee brought before the bench during proceedings before us that the assessment order passed by the A.O. is an ex-parte order and the ld. CIT(A) has also passed his appellate order as an ex-parte order. The counsel, therefore, argued that the case has not been discussed or assessed on merit before the lower authorities. 4. The ld. DR relied on the order of the ld. CIT(A). 5. We have considered the submissions of the ld. counsel regarding this order being an ex-parte order both before the ld. Assessing Officer in the assessment proceedings as well as before the ld. CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings. 6. Thus, we find that the issues in this case have not been discussed on merit after due consideration of assessee’s submission. 7. Therefore, keeping in view, the element of natural justice with the assessee, we are inclined to remand this appeal back to the file of the A.O. for passing an order de-novo after giving adequate opportunities to the assessee of being heard as well as to allow him to file written Printed from counselvise.com 4 I.T.A. No. 961/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 submissions if any. The assessee will have all the legal issues before him. The assessee is also directed to co-operate with the department for completion of proceedings before authorities below. 8. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in open court as on 17.02.2026 Sd/- Sd/- (Udayan Dasgupta) (Krinwant Sahay) Judicial Member Accountant Member *GP/Sr.PS* Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Appellant: (2) The Respondent: (3) The CIT concerned (4) The Sr. DR, I.T.A.T True Copy By Order Printed from counselvise.com "