ARCHANA PRASAD KUDCHADKAR,MARGAO V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, MARGAO

ITA 36/PAN/2023

AI Insights

The case involves Archana Prasad Kudchadkar, the appellant, who filed an appeal against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which was itself based on an earlier assessment order by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Margao, Goa, for the assessment year 2013-14. The appeal was filed under section 253(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 26/12/2022. However, during the proceedings, the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal, as indicated in a letter dated 09/02/2026. Both the appellant's representative and the Revenue expressed no objection to this withdrawal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 835208 (ITAT-PANAJI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: WT(D)
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 10-02-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RIJJULA UNIYAL LD.
• Assessee Lawyers: D E ROBINSON LD.

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, GOA ITAT-Panaji Page 1 of 2 BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 036/PAN/2023, Assessment Year : 2013-14 Archana Prasad Kudchadkar H.No. 653, Sarthaki, Opp. Kadamba Bus Stop, Margao, Goa.-403601 PAN : AIHPK7280M . . . . . . . Appellant V/s Income Tax Officer Ward-3, Margao, Goa. . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee by : Mr D E Robinson [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Ms Rijjula Uniyal [‘Ld. DR’] Date of conclusive Hearing: 09/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 10/02/2026 ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; This appeal of the assessee is instituted u/s 253(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ in short] challenges the DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048246075 dt. 26/12/2022 passed u/s 250 of the Act by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. NFAC’ in short] which in turn arisen from the order of assessment dt. 22/03/2016 passed u/s143(1) of the Printed from counselvise.com Archana Prasad Kudchodkar Vs ITO, Margao ITA No. 036/PAN/2023, AY: 2013-14 ITAT-Panaji Page 2 of 2 Act by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Margao, Goa [‘Ld. AO’ in short] for assessment year 2013-14 [‘AY’ in short] 2. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR sought our attention to the appellant’s letter dt. 09/02/2026 seeking to withdraw the present appeal. Entreating contents thereof, the Ld. AR prayed for withdrawal of appeal. The Revenue expressed no-objection in allowing such withdrawal request. 3. The application for withdrawal endorsed by the registry as received vide inward no 310 dt 09/02/2026 perused and noted the contents thereof. Finding no reasons to reject the request, we permit the withdrawal and dismiss the present appeal of the appellant. 4. In result, the appeal of the assessee is DISMISSED as withdrawn. U/r 34 of ITAT Rules, order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned herein above. -S/d- -S/d- PAVAN KUMAR GADALE G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Panaji, Dated : 10th day of February, 2026 Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपीलार्थी / The Applicant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The CIT-(A)/NFAC Concerned. 4. The Pr.CIT, Panaji 5. DR, ITAT, Panaji Bench, Goa 6.गार्डफ़ाइल / Guard File. By Order Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Panaji. Printed from counselvise.com "