BANDO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,GURGAON, HARYANA V. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), GURGAON , GURGAON, HARYANA

ITA 6020/DEL/2025

AI Insights

Bando India Pvt Ltd appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, which confirmed the addition of Rs. 9,25,662 towards Duty Drawback to the assessee's income for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The primary contention was whether the duty drawback should be taxed on an accrual basis or upon actual receipt. The Assessing Officer had added the amount to the income based on the mercantile system of accounting, while the assessee argued for the actual receipt basis as per Section 145B(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal sided with the assessee, emphasizing the consistency of the accounting policy and its acceptance in previous years.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 842379 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 25-09-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Deemed to accrue or arise in india
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

"6020_DEL_2025_Bando India Pvt Ltd 1 | P a g e IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SMT. RENU JAUHRI, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 6020/DEL/2025; Assessment Year: 2018-19 Bando India Private Ltd. Unit No. 411, 4th Floor, JMD Pacific Square NH 8, Sector-15 Gurgaon- 122002 Haryana Vs ITO Vanijya Kunj Udyog Nagar, Phase-V, Gurgaon, Haryana (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN/TAN No. AACCB2994D Assessee Represented by: Shri Arun Kishore, CA Revenue/Department Represented by: Shri Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 25.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement: 26.02.2026 ORDER PER RENU JAUHRI : The above captioned appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 21.08.2025, passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [for short, Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as, “Act”] for A.Y. 2018-19 in Appeal No. NFAC/2017-18/10086237. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “(i) That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 9,25,662/- towards Duty Drawback, as erroneously made by the Ld. Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) order dated 03.09.2021. Printed from counselvise.com 6020_DEL_2025_Bando India Pvt Ltd 2 | P a g e (ii) That as per the specific provisions of Section 145B (3) r.w.s. 2(24)(xviii), Duty Drawback is taxable on Accrual basis. (iii) That Ld. CIT(A) and AO have both erred in taxing Duty Drawback of Rs. 9,25,662/- on accrual basis, when the appellant has been consistently declaring this income on actual receipt basis. (iv) That as per note no. 2 annexed with the audited financial statements, the appellant had declared the basis of preparation of financial statements as: “The accounting policies adopted in preparation of the financial statements are consistent with those of the previous years”. (v) That the addition of Rs. 9,25,662/- erroneously made by changing the consistently followed accounting policy of the appellant, be deleted.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return for A.Y. 2018-19 on 29.11.2018, declaring NIL income and deemed income u/s 151JB at Rs. 15,07,99,048/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act at an income of Rs. 10,88,640/- and deemed income u/s 151JB at Rs. 15,07,99,048/- . Subsequently, the case was selected for limited scrutiny on the ground that there was a mismatch in duty drawback offered as income by the assessee and as per the Central Board of Excise and Customs (for short, CBEC) data. The assessee contended that income on account of duty drawback claims is being offered on actual receipt basis consistently since last several years. However, Ld. AO rejected the assessee’s contention and observed that the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting, and, therefore, the duty drawback amount of Rs. 9,25,662/- not offered as income was added to the total income and assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A). Printed from counselvise.com 6020_DEL_2025_Bando India Pvt Ltd 3 | P a g e 3.1 Ld. CIT(A) also concurred with the observations of Ld. AO and held that since the assessee followed mercantile system of accounting, provisions of section 145B(2) of the Act are applicable whereas the assessee contended that section 145B(3) is applicable in its case. Vide order dated 21.08.2025, Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal after rejecting assessee’s contentions. Further aggrieved, the assessee filed present appeal before the Tribunal. 4. Before us, Ld. AR has submitted that the assessee’s case is clearly covered by the provisions of section 145B(3) according to which the income from duty drawback etc is deemed to be the income of the previous year in which it is received. Ld. AR has further pointed that this system of accounting in respect of duty drawback is being consistently followed by the assessee and the same has been accepted by the revenue in earlier years even under scrutiny. 4.1 On the other hand, Ld. DR has argued that the issue was taken up based on specific inputs from the CBEC data as per which duty drawback of Rs. 9,80,193/- was sanctioned during the relevant financial year whereas the assessee had offered only Rs. 54,531/- as income in the year under consideration. Since the amount was sanctioned by the CBEC, there was a reasonable certainty of its realisation within the year and accordingly, the remaining amount of Rs. 9,25,662/- has rightly been taxed by the Ld. AO during the year under consideration. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We note that the taxability of income received by way of duty drawback Printed from counselvise.com 6020_DEL_2025_Bando India Pvt Ltd 4 | P a g e etc is specifically covered by the provisions of section 145B and the relevant sub section (3) is reproduced below: “Sec. 145B (1) (2) (3) The income referred to in sub-clause (xviii) of clause (24) of section 2 shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which it is received, if not charged to income-tax in any earlier previous year.” 6. In view of clear legal position, we are of the considered view that the duty drawback has rightly been shown as income in the year of receipt and Ld. AO was not justified in including the same on accrual basis during the year under consideration. Accordingly, we hereby, direct the Ld. AO to delete the addition of Rs. 9,25,662/- made on account of duty drawback. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26.02.2026 . Sd/- Sd/- (YOGESH KUMAR US) (RENU JAUHRI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 26.02.2026 Pooja Mittal, Sr. PS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi Printed from counselvise.com "