The case involves Briijbhoan Agrawal, the appellant, who contested the addition of undisclosed income following a survey at his business premises. The survey revealed excess cash and stock, which the appellant initially surrendered as undisclosed income. However, he later retracted this surrender, claiming the cash belonged to his wife and mother, who were also taxpayers. The Assessing Officer rejected this explanation, leading to the appellant's appeal to the CIT (Appeals) and subsequently to the Tribunal, both of which upheld the initial assessment. The Tribunal found the appellant's retraction and explanation implausible, given the circumstances and the lack of corroborative evidence.
Team Counselvise - March 13, 2026
Team Counselvise - February 07, 2026
Team Counselvise - March 10, 2026