BVG DEVELOPRS,PUNE V. INCOME TAX AUTHORITY, PUNE

ITA 1057/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves BVG Developers, a partnership firm engaged in construction, appealing against the orders of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) which confirmed the disallowance of TDS claims for the assessment years 2022-23 and 2023-24. The primary contention was the ex-parte order confirming the disallowance of TDS amounting to Rs.15,69,603, which was claimed based on entries in Form 26AS but was disallowed due to non-recognition of corresponding receipts in the financial year. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's request for a fresh opportunity to present its case, leading to the restoration of the matter to the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A).

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 787893 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-11-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 17-04-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A D KULKARNI
• Assessee Lawyers: GAURI S MANJREKAR
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; TDS

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE JUSTICE (RETD.) C V BHADANG, PRESIDENT AND SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT ITA Nos.1057 & 1053/PUN/2025 Assessment years : 2022-23 & 2023-24 BVG Developers Sant Tukaram Vyapar Sankul Pradhikaran, Nigdi, Pune – 411044 Vs. DCIT, Circle-8, Pune PAN: AAQFB0396J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms. Gauri S Manjrekar Department by : Shri A D Kulkarni Date of hearing : 24-11-2025 Date of pronouncement : 24-11-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, VP: The above 2 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 26.02.2025 of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Kolkata relating to assessment years 2022-23 and 2023-24. Since identical grounds have been raised by the assessee in both the appeals, therefore, for the sake of convenience, these were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. ITA No.1057/PUN/2025 (A.Y. 2022-23) 2. Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the ex-parte order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) in confirming the Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA Nos.1057 & 1053/PUN/2025 order of the CPC disallowing the claim of TDS of Rs.15,69,603/- as reflected in 26AS. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of construction of residential and commercial projects. It filed its return of income on 30.09.2022 declaring total income at Rs.54,34,100/-. The CPC in the intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) disallowed the claim of TDS of Rs.15,69,603/- on the ground that the corresponding receipts in respect of such TDS were not taken in the relevant financial year. Accordingly, the CPC raised a demand along with interest as per Rule 37BA. The assessee filed a rectification application before the CPC which was rejected. Thereafter, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A), who dismissed the same on account of non-appearance. 4. Aggrieved with such order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the receipt was an advance payment which was credited to the books as a liability i.e. advance from customers and the corresponding revenue was recognized on the completion of the project in assessment years 2024-25 and 2025-26 and due taxes have been paid. Referring to various pages of the paper book, he submitted that the assessee has not claimed any Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA Nos.1057 & 1053/PUN/2025 TDS of assessment year 2022-23 again in the assessment year in which corresponding receipts are offered for tax i.e. assessment years 2024-25 and 2025- 26. He submitted that he has no objection if the matter is restored to the file of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) for fresh adjudication since he has passed an ex-parte order. 6. The Ld. DR on the other hand heavily supported the order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A). 7. We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the Assessing Officer and the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) and the paper book filed on behalf of the assessee. It is an admitted fact that due to non-compliance to the statutory notices issued by the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A), he dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that in the interest of justice the assessee should be given one final opportunity to substantiate its case by filing the requisite details before the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A). Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) with a direction to decide issue as per fact and law after giving due opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also hereby directed to participate in the appeal proceedings and submit the requisite details before the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) on the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA Nos.1057 & 1053/PUN/2025 and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. ITA No.1053/PUN/2025 (A.Y. 2023-24) 8. After hearing both sides we find the grounds raised by the assessee are identical to the grounds raised in assessment year 2022-23. We have already decided the issue and the matter has been restored to the file of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) with a direction to decide the issue afresh. Following similar reasonings, we allow the grounds raised by the assessee for statistical purposes. 9. In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court at the conclusion of hearing itself i.e. on 24th November, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (JUSTICE (RETD.) C.V. BHADANG) (R. K. PANDA) PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दिन ांक Dated : 24th November, 2025 GCVSR Printed from counselvise.com 5 ITA Nos.1057 & 1053/PUN/2025 आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. 4. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 27.11.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 27.11.2025 Sr. PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member AM/AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order Printed from counselvise.com "