IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : E , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL M EMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO .1193 /DE L/ 2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 14, NEW DELHI VS. M/S. KANDA AGRICULTURE P. LTD., FLAT NO. 4, RR APARTMENTS, 3 - 4, MANGLAPURI, MEHRAULI, DELHI PAN : AADCK0216C (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) AND C.O. NO.180/DEL/2016 [ARISING OUT OF ITA NO .1193 /DEL/ 2016 ] ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007 - 08 M/S. KANDA AGRICULTURE P. LTD., FLAT NO. 4, RR APARTMENTS, 3 - 4, MANGLAPURI, MEHRAULI, DELHI VS. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 14, NEW DELHI PAN : AADCK0216C (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) DEPARTMENT BY SHRI R.L. MEENA, CIT(DR) ASSESSEE BY SHRI LALIT MOHAN, CA DATE OF HEARING 24.09.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 14.10.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM: THE PRESENT APPEAL BY THE REVENUE AND THE CROSS - OBJECTIONS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST ORDER DATED 03.12.2015 , 2 ITA NO. 1193/DEL./2016 & C.O. NO. 180/DEL./2016 PASSED BY LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - XXVI , NEW DELHI, FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007 - 08 . 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LEARNED SR. DR BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT CBDT, VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08 TH AUGUST, 2019, HAS DECIDED THAT THE REVENUE WOULD NO T PREFER ANY APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, IF THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.50 LAKHS. THEREFORE, HE PLEADED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE BE DECIDED AS PER THE INSTRUCTION OF THE CBDT. 3. WE FIND THAT THE CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019, HAS ENHANCED THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING OF APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FROM RS.20 LAKHS TO RS.50 LAKHS. THE SAID CIRCULAR ALSO MAKES REFERENCE TO THE EARLIER CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018, DATED 11.7.2018 AND, ESPECIALLY STA TES THAT AS A STEP TOWARDS FURTHER MANAGEMENT OF LITIGATION, THE BOARD HAS DECIDED TO ENHANCE THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING OF THE APPEALS. THIS CIRCULAR IS NOT IN SUPERSESSION OF THE EARLIER CIRCULAR BUT ONLY AMENDS THE MONETARY LIMITS AS WELL AS GIVES CL ARIFICATION WITH REGARD TO PARAGRAPH 5 OF THE EARLIER CIRCULAR. THIS, INTER ALIA, MEANS THAT ALL THE OTHER CONDITIONS MENTIONED IN THE EARLIER CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11.7.2018 WILL APPLY MUTATIS MUTANDIS INCLUDING THAT, IT WILL APPLY TO ALL THE PENDI NG APPEALS. FOR THE SAKE OF READY REFERENCE, RELEVANT PORTION OF THE LATEST CIRCULAR, I.E., CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019, DATED 08.08.2019, IS REPRODUCED AS UNDER: SUBJECT: - FURTHER ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING OF APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE I NCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, HIGH COURTS AND SLPS/APPEALS BEFORE SUPREME COURT - AMENDMENT TO CIRCULAR 3 OF 2018 - MEASURES FOR REDUCING LITIGATION. - REFERENCE IS INVITED TO THE CIRCULAR NO.3 OF2018 DATED 11.07.2018 (THE CIRCULAR) OF CENTRAL BOARD OF DI RECT TAXES 3 ITA NO. 1193/DEL./2016 & C.O. NO. 180/DEL./2016 (THE BOARD) AND ITS AMENDMENT DATED 20TH AUGUST. 2018 VIDE WHICH MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING OF INCOME TAX APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. HIGH COURTS AND SLPS/APPEALS BEFORE SUPREME COURT HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED. REPR ESENTATION HAS ALSO BEEN RECEIVED THAT AN ANOMALY IN THE SAID CIRCULAR AT PARA 5 MAY BE REMOVED. 2. AS A STEP TOWARDS FURTHER MANAGEMENT OF LITIGATION. IT HAS BEEN DECIDED BY THE BOARD THAT MONETARY LIMITS FOR FILING OF APPEALS IN INCOME - TAX CASES BE ENHANCED FURTHER THROUGH AMENDMENT IN PARA 3 OF THE CIRCULAR MENTIONED ABOVE AND ACCORDINGLY, THE TAB LE FOR MONETARY LIMITS SPECIFIED IN PARA 3 OF THE CIRCULAR SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS: S.NO APPEALS/SLPS IN INCOME TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (RS.) 1. BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 50,00,000/ - 2. BEFORE HIGH COURT 1,00.00.000/ - 3. BEFORE SUPREME COURT 2,00,00,000/ - 3. FURTHER, WITH A VIEW TO PROVIDE PARITY IN FILING OF APPEALS IN SCENARIOS WHERE SEPARATE ORDER IS PASSED BY HIGHER APPELLATE AUTHORITIES FOR EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR VIS - A - VIS WHERE COMPOSITE ORDER FOR MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR S IS PASSED. PARA 5 OF THE CIRCULAR IS SUBSTITUTED BY THE FOLLOWING PARA: '5. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL CALCULATE THE TAX EFFECT SEPARATELY FOR EVERY ASSESSMENT YEAR IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUES IN THE CASE OF EVERY ASSESSEE. IF, IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSEE, THE DISPUTED ISSUES ARISE IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, APPEAL CAN BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUES EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3. NO APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF AN ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3. FURTHER, EVEN IN THE CASE OF COMPOSITE ORDER OF ANY HIGH COURT OR APPELLATE AUTHORITY WHICH INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YE AR AND COMMON ISSUES IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, NO APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF AN ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3. IN CASE WHERE A COMPOSITE ORDER/ JUDGEMENT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSEE. EACH ASSESSEE SHALL BE DEALT WITH SEPARATELY. 4. THE SAID MODIFICATIONS SHALL COME INTO EFFECT FROM THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THIS CIRCULAR. 5. THE SAME MAY BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF ALL CONCERNED. 4 ITA NO. 1193/DEL./2016 & C.O. NO. 180/DEL./2016 6. THIS ISSUES UNDER SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT, 1961. 4. FURTHER, CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR DATED 20 TH AUGUST, 2019 (F. NO. 279/19 - 93/2018 - ITJ), HAS CLARIFIED THAT IT WILL APPLY TO ALL PENDING APPEALS. THUS, IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID CIRCULAR, THE APPEALS OF THE REVENUE ARE DISMISSED AS NON - MAINTAINABLE AS THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE APPEALS IS BELOW RS. 50 LAKHS. HOWEVER, IT IS MADE CLEAR THAT THE DEPARTMENT IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RECALLING OF THE ORDER, IF THE TAX EFFECT IS FOUND TO BE MORE THAN THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT OF RS.50,00,000/ - OR ANY OF THE CONDITIONS ETC., AS AVAILABL E IN THE AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT IN PARA 10 OF CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018, DATED 20.08.2018, IS MADE OUT. THE APPEAL IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. THE CROSS OBJECTION FI LED BY THE ASSESSEE , WHICH IS IN SUPPORT OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER, HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AND THUS, DISMISS ED AS INFRUCTUOUS. 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF REVENUE AS WELL AS THE CROSS OBJECTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER IS PRONOUN CED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14 TH OCTOBER , 201 9 . SD/ - SD/ - ( BHAVNESH SAINI ) ( O.P. KANT ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 14 TH OCTOBER , 201 9 . RK / - (D.T.D . ) COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI