Yuva Wines, Rajahmundry V. THE ITO, Rajahmundry

CO 41/VIZ/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1817 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Cross Objection
• Pronouncement Date: 22-12-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 07-11-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

ITA NO.293/VIZAG/2014 & CO NO.41/VIZAG/2014 M/S. YUVA WINES, KOTERU, RAJAHMUNDRY 1 , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM . . . . , . . . . , $ $ $ $ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.293/VIZAG/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) ITO WARD - 4 RAJAHMUNDRY VS. M/S. YUVA WINES, KATERU RAJAHMUNDRY [ PAN : AAAFY 8462C ] ( & & & & / APPELLANT) ( '(& '(& '(& '(& / RESPONDENT ) C.O. NO.41/VIZAG/2014 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A.NOS.293/VIZAG/2014) ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) M/S. YUVA WINE S, KATERU RAJAHMUNDRY VS. ITO WARD - 4 RAJAHMUNDRY ( & & & & / APPELLANT) ( '(& '(& '(& '(& / RESPONDENT ) & ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI M.N. MURTHY NAIK, DR '(& ) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI G.V.N. HARI, AR ) - / DATE OF HEARING : 22.12.2015 ) - / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 22.12.2015 / O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE CIT(A), VISAKHAPATNAM DATED 24.3.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YE ARS 2009-10 AND THE CROSS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN SUPPOR T OF ORDER OF CIT(A). ITA NO.293/VIZAG/2014 & CO NO.41/VIZAG/2014 M/S. YUVA WINES, KOTERU, RAJAHMUNDRY 2 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL IS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IS BELOW RS.10 LAKHS. AS PER THE LATEST CIRCULAR NO.2 1/2015 DATED 10.12.2015 OF CBDT BEING RETROSPECTIVE IN NATURE, T HE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE LD. D.R. HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HENCE, THE SAME IS DISMISSED. 3. THE CROSS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ONLY SUPP ORT THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A). IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, CROSS APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED AND THE CROSS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALSO DISMISSED. THE ABOVE ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22 ND DEC15. SD/- SD/- ( . . . . ) ( . ) ( G. MANJUNATHA) ( (( ( V. DURGA RAO ) )) ) / // / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / // / JUDICIAL MEMBER /VISAKHAPATNAM: 3 / DATED : 22.12.2015 VG/SPS ITA NO.293/VIZAG/2014 & CO NO.41/VIZAG/2014 M/S. YUVA WINES, KOTERU, RAJAHMUNDRY 3 ) ' 4 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO :- 1. & / THE APPELLANT THE ITO WARD-4, RAJAHMUNDRY 2. '(& / THE RESPONDENT M/S. YUVA WINES, D.NO.2-119/2, KATERU, RAJAHMUNDRY. 3. 5 / THE CIT, RAJAHMUNDRY 4. 5 () / THE CIT(A), VISAKHAPATNAM 5. ' , , / // / DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM 6 . . . . / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // 9: ( SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ) , / // / ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM