DATTATRAY MAHADEV TUPE,PUNE V. ITO WARD 14(2) PUNE, PUNE

ITA 808/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Dattatray Mahadev Tupe, the appellant, who did not file his income tax return for the assessment year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer reopened his case under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to information about a property purchase and a cash deposit in his bank account. Despite receiving notices under sections 148 and 142(1), the assessee failed to respond, leading to an ex-parte assessment of his income at Rs.53,00,000. The appeal to the Ld. CIT(A) was dismissed for non-prosecution as the assessee did not respond to notices. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances and the assessee's claim of not receiving communication, decided to restore the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) for a final opportunity to be heard.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 788122 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-11-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 26-03-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A D KULKARNI
• Assessee Lawyers: BARVE
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Competent authority
• Section: 147; 148; 144; 142(1)

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.808/PUN/2025 Assessment year : 2012-13 Dattatray Mahadev Tupe Flat No.506, Aspire Tower B 12, Amanora City, Hadapsar, Pune – 411028 Vs. ITO, Ward-14(2), Pune PAN: ADYPT5448E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri D R Barve Department by : Shri A D Kulkarni Date of hearing : 27-11-2025 Date of pronouncement : 27-11-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, VP: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16.12.2024 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi relating to assessment year 2012-13. 2. Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the ex-parte order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC in dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee due to non-prosecution. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and has not filed his return of income for the impugned assessment year. Information was available with the Assessing Officer that the assessee along with other co-owners had purchased an immovable property for a total consideration of Rs.1,00,00,000/- Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No.808/PUN/2025 and made cash deposit of Rs.3,00,000/- in his bank account with Janaseva Sahakari Bank. Accordingly, the case of the assessee was reopened by invoking the provisions of section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) after taking prior approval of the competent authority. Thereafter, statutory notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee on 31.03.2019 which was duly served upon him. However, the assessee did not file any return in response to the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act. The various notices issued subsequently u/s 142(1) of the Act were also remained un-complied with. The Assessing Officer, therefore, completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act by determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.53,00,000/-. 4. Since the assessee did not respond to the statutory notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC dismissed the appeal filed by the assesse for want of prosecution. 5. Aggrieved with such order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that no communication was received in the e-mail ID provided by the assessee in Form No.35 for which the assessee could not respond to any of the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. He submitted that in the interest of justice, the assessee should be given an opportunity to substantiate his case by filing the requisite details. Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No.808/PUN/2025 7. The Ld. DR on the other hand while strongly opposing the arguments of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, however, submitted that he has no objection if the matter is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee. 8. We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the Assessing Officer and the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC and the paper book filed on behalf of the assessee. We find due to non-compliance to the statutory notices issued by the Assessing Officer, he completed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.53,00,000/-. Since the assessee did not respond to any of the statutory notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, he dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that given an opportunity, the assessee is in a position to substantiate his case by filing the requisite details before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee and decide the issue in accordance with law after providing due opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also hereby directed to submit the requisite details before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC on the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No.808/PUN/2025 9. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court at the conclusion of hearing itself i.e. on 27th November, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (ASTHA CHANDRA) (R. K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दिन ांक Dated : 27th November, 2025 GCVSR आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. 4. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 28.11.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 28.11.2025 Sr. PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member AM/AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order Printed from counselvise.com "