DEBASIS BEHERA,SARALA V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD KEONJHAR

ITA 46/CTK/2026

AI Insights

This case involves an appeal by Debasis Behera against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, which was dated 27/11/2025 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The appeal was dismissed ex-parte by both the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A) due to the assessee's failure to substantiate his claims with relevant documents. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances and the need for justice, decided to restore the matter to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for a fresh decision, contingent upon the payment of a cost of Rs. 5,000 by the assessee.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 840991 (ITAT-CUTTACK)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 17-01-2026
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.46/CTK/2026 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Debasis Behera, PO: Danar, PS: Nandipada Keonjhar PAN No./BEOPB 7184 M Vs. Income Tax officer, Ward, Keonjhar Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee represented by Shri Digant Das, AR Department represented by Shri Sanjib Banerjee, Sr.DR Date of hearing 25/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 25/02/2026 O R D E R PER: BENCH 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2017-18/10264799 dated 27/11/2025 for the A.Y. 2018-19. 2. Shri Digant Das, ld. A.R. is appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sanjib Banerjee, ld. Sr.DR represented on behalf of the revenue. 3. It was submitted by the ld. AR that the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A) have dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte. It was the prayer that the matter may be restored to the file of the jurisdictional AO to decide the issue involved in the appeal afresh so that the assessee could be able to produce all the evidences to substantiate its claim. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 46/Ctk/2026 2 4. In reply, ld Sr.DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A). It was the submission that if the issue is to be restored to the file of ld.AO, then a cost should be imposed. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed from the orders of the authorities below that the assessee could not substantiate its claim by providing relevant documents. Even the assessee was also failed to produce the evidences as required by the ld. CIT(A) and in absence of the same, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee. This being so, in the interest of justice, we restore the issues in the appeal to the file of ld. jurisdictional AO for adjudicating afresh after providing the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. However, looking to the non-cooperation of the assessee during the course of appellate proceedings even after issuance of notices to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A), we impose a cost of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five Thousand only) on the assessee, as admitted by the ld. A.R. of the assessee, to be payable to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association, Sector-1, CDA, Cuttack- 753014, within sixty days from the date of this order and receipt of the same would be produced before the AO at the first hearing. Should the assessee not pay the above-mentioned costs within the prescribed period of sixty days from the date of this order, the order of the ld. CIT(A) shall stand confirmed. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No. 46/Ctk/2026 3 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 17/02/2026. Sd/- Sd/- (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) (GEORGE MATHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack , Dated: 17/02/2026 *Ranjan, Sr. PS Copy to: 1. Assessee - 2. Revenue- I.T.O., 3. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi 4. CIT 5. DR 6. Guard File By Order Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Cuttack Printed from counselvise.com "