DIRECTOR GEN. OF INCOME TAX and ORS. V. THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMM. and ANR.

WPC/3122/2009

AI Insights

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, concerning the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation) based in Bhopal and Raipur. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition, and the application for withdrawal was unopposed. The court, after considering the application, granted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 691388 (HC-INDIA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 25-09-2009
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Constitution of India
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Assessee Lawyers: R R SINHA; M P S BHAFLA
• Keywords: Income Tax; Investigation; Withdrawal of writ petition
• Section: 226

Judgement Text

"W 6 0 ( S i n g l e B e n c h ; H o n ' b l e M r . J u s ‘ r i c e D h i r e n d m M i s h r ' a ) W . P . ( C ) N o . 3 1 2 2 / 2 0 0 9 ( P e f i ’ r i o n U / A 2 2 6 o f T h e C o n s ’ r h ‘ u ’ r i o n o f I n d i a ) P E T I T I O N E R S . D i r e c ‘ f o r ‘ G e n e r a l o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s f i g o ‘ l ' i o n ) , A a y k a r ' B h a w c m , H o s h a n g a b a d R o a d , B H O P A L ( M P ) . D i r e c T o r ' o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s f i g a ’ r i o n ) , A a Y k a r ‘ B h a w a n , H o s h a n g a b a d R o a d , B H O P A L ( M P ) . A d d i f i o n a l D i r e c t o r o f I n c o m e T a x ( I n v e s t i g a ’ r i o n ) , C e n ’ r r ‘ a l R e v e n u e B u i l d i n g , C i v i l L i n e s , R o i p u r ( C G ) V s R E S P O N D E N T S T h e C e m ‘ r ' a l I n f o r m a T i o n C o m m i s s i o n , 2 n d F l o o r ' , B - W i n g , A u g u s f K m n f i B h a w a n , B h i k o j i C o m a P l a c e , N e w D e l h i 1 1 0 0 6 6 . S h r i G u r p r e e f S i n g h C h a n d o k , V I P R o a d , D r ' . R a j e n d m P r a s a d W o r d , R a i p u r ( C G ) P r e s e n t : r M r ‘ . R R . S i n h a , A d v o c a ' r e f o r ’ r h e p e ’ r i ’ r i o n e r ' s . M r . M . P . S . B h a f i a , A d v o c a T e f o r r e s p o n d e n ‘ r N o . 2 . O r a l O r d e r ( 2 5 . 0 9 . 2 0 0 9 ) 1 . H e a r d o n I . A . N o . 3 , a p p l i c a t i o n f o r w i ’ r h d r a w a l o f w r i f p e ‘ r i f i o n . 2 . N o f o p p o s e d . . T p e ’ r i f o n i s i s i s s e d a s w t h d r a w n S d / - 3 h e i d m i . , . . D h i r e n d r a M i s h r a 1 J u d g e 1 "