GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD. (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO GE INDIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD., NOW AMALGAMA V. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, OSD-10, NEW DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(C)/7645/2021

AI Insights

The case involves GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd., which is the successor in interest to GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. and GE India Exports Pvt. Ltd., against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. The core issue was the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to entities that had already merged with the petitioner company. The petitioners argued that the notices were flawed as they were issued to non-existent entities. The respondents acknowledged the error but contended it was inadvertent and sought to issue fresh notices. The court found in favor of the petitioners, setting aside the notices and allowing the respondents to issue new ones if deemed necessary.

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 760000 (HC-DELHI)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 17-11-2021
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: ABHISHEK MARATHA
• Assessee Lawyers: SACHIT JOLLY; ROHIT GARG; DISHA JHAM; MEHAK SACHDEVA; SOHUM DUA
• Keywords: Income Tax; Merger; Notice; Flawed Notice
• Section: 148

Judgement Text

"W.P.(C) 7644/2021 & 7645/2021 Page 1 of 3 $~13 & 14 (2021) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17.11.2021 + W.P.(C) 7644/2021 & CM APPL. 23916/2021 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD. AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PVT. LTD., NOW AMALGAMATED ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Mr. Rohit Garg, Ms. Disha Jham, Ms. Mehak Sachdeva and Mr. Sohum Dua, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10 1 NEW DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department. + W.P.(C) 7645/2021 & CM APPL. 23918/2021 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD. (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO GE INDIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD., NOW AMALGAMATED) ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Mr. Rohit Garg, Ms. Disha Jham, Ms. Mehak Sachdeva and Mr. Sohum Dua, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, OSD-10, NEW DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL) [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] Digitally Signed By:MAMTA RANI Signing Date:22.11.2021 11:42 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 7644/2021 & 7645/2021 Page 2 of 3 1. On the previous date, i.e., 11.11.2021, we had heard the counsel for the parties and made, thereafter, the following observations in W.P.(C) 7644/2021: “1. Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents/revenue. 2. Mr. Sachit Jolly, who appears for the petitioner-company, says that, apart from anything else, the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short \"the Act\"], is flawed, for the reason that it was served on an entity i.e., GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd., which was not in existence at the relevant time, as it had merged with the petitioner-company i.e., GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. 3. Prima facie, there appears to be merit in the contention advanced by Mr. Jolly. 3.1. Mr. Maratha says that, he will revert with instructions on this aspect of the matter. 4. We may also note that although opportunity was given to the respondents/revenue to file a counter-affidavit in the matter; no affidavit has been filed, as yet. 5. List the matter for directions on 17.11.2021. 6. Interim order dated 05.08.2021 is made absolute during the pendency of the writ petition. CM No.23918/2021 is, accordingly, disposed of.” 1.1. Similar observation were made in the order dated 11.11.2021, passed in W.P.(C) 7645/2021. 2. Mr. Abhishek Maratha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/revenue, has reverted with instructions. 2.1. Mr. Maratha says that, admittedly, notice(s) were issued to entities i.e., GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. and GE India Exports Pvt. Ltd., which were not in existence at the relevant time, as they had merged with the petitioner-company i.e., GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. 2.2. It is, however, Mr. Maratha’s contention that it was an inadvertent Digitally Signed By:MAMTA RANI Signing Date:22.11.2021 11:42 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 7644/2021 & 7645/2021 Page 3 of 3 error, and therefore, the respondents/revenue are entitled in law to issue fresh notice(s) in the above-captioned matters, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short “the Act”], and that these notice(s) will relate to the period prior to 30.06.2021. 2.2(a) However, Mr. Jolly, vehemently, opposes the aforesaid submissions adverted by Mr Maratha. 3. To our minds, the impugned notice(s) issued under Section 148 of the Act cannot be sustained, as they were issued to entities [i.e., GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. in W.P.(C) 7644/2021 and GE India Exports Pvt. Ltd. in W.P.(C) 7645/2021], which were not in existence at the relevant time, as they had merged with the petitioner-company i.e., GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. 3.1. Therefore, the impugned notice(s) dated 30.06.2021 are set aside. 4. The respondents/revenue will have liberty to take next steps in the matter, albeit as per law. In case any such steps are taken, the petitioner- company will have the liberty to assail the same, in accordance with law. 5. The above-captioned writ petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Consequently, pending application(s) shall also stand closed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TALWANT SINGH, J NOVEMBER 17, 2021/pa Click here to check corrigendum, if any Digitally Signed By:MAMTA RANI Signing Date:22.11.2021 11:42 Signature Not Verified "