GEETA NIHICHLANI, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI V. ITO, WARD DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

ITA 80/RPR/2026

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Geeta Nichilani against an order from the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC for the assessment year 2021-22. The appeal was heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, under the 'SMC' (Single Member Chamber) category. During the proceedings, the counsel for the assessee submitted a request to withdraw the appeal, which was accepted by the tribunal without any objections from the revenue side. The tribunal's decision to allow the withdrawal led to the dismissal of the appeal.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 839885 (ITAT-RAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-02-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2021-2022
• Appeal Filed On: 30-01-2026
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRIYANKA PATEL
• Assessee Lawyers: SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL; FILING AN

Judgement Text

"आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण Ûयायपीठ “एक-सदèय” मामला रायपुर मɅ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR Įी पाथ[ सारथी चौधरȣ, ÛयाǓयक सदèय क े सम¢ BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.80/RPR/2026 Ǔनधा[रण वष[ /Assessment Year : 2021-22 Geeta Nichilani C/o. Anil Medical Agency, DCH Complex, in front of New Bus Stand, Dhamtari (C.G.) PAN: ABOPN9260E .......अपीलाथȸ / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-Dhamtari (C.G) ……Ĥ×यथȸ / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CA Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई कȧ तारȣख / Date of Hearing : 26.02.2026 घोषणा कȧ तारȣख / Date of Pronouncement : 26.02.2026 Printed from counselvise.com 2 Geeta Nichilani Vs. ITO, Ward-Dhamtari ITA No.80/RPR/2026 आदेश / ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 11.11.2025 for the assessment year 2021-22 as per the grounds of appeal on record. 2. At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee by filing an application dated 26.02.2026 submitted that he intends to withdraw the captioned appeal. The relevant contents of the said letter are extracted as follows: Printed from counselvise.com 3 Geeta Nichilani Vs. ITO, Ward-Dhamtari ITA No.80/RPR/2026 3. The Ld. Sr. DR did not raise any objection regarding withdrawal of the captioned appeal filed by the assessee. 4. Having heard the submissions of the parties herein, I permit the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 26th day of February, 2026. Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) ÛयाǓयक सदèय/JUDICIAL MEMBER रायपुर / Raipur; Ǒदनांक / Dated : 26th February, 2026. SB, Sr. PS आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथȸ / The Appellant. 2. Ĥ×यथȸ / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT-1, Raipur (C.G.) 4. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध, आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, “एक-सदèय” बɅच, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Raipur. 5. गाड[ फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur Printed from counselvise.com "