" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL \"G\" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER MA No.42/MUM/2025 (Arising out of ITA No.3296/Mum/2023) (Assessment Year:2018-2019) GHV Hotel (India) Pvt. Ltd. Kedy Compound,, Near Bombay Mercantile Co-op. Bank Ltd., Nagapada Junction, Mumbai - 400008. [PAN:AADCG0971E] ……………. Appellant Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(4), Mumbai Pratishtha Bhavan, Mumbai – 400020. ……………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/ Assessee For the Respondent/Department : : Shri K. C. Thaker Shri Himanshu Joshi Date Conclusion of hearing Pronouncement of order : : 27.06.2025 01.07.2025 O R D E R Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: 1. The present Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by the Assessee for rectification of order, dated 29/08/2024, passed by the Tribunal in ITA No.3296/Mum/2023, pertaining to the Assessment Year 2018-2019. 2. We have heard both the sides and have perused the material on record. 3. Vide order dated, 29/08/2024, passed by the Tribunal, the appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed off without hearing the Assessee. The Assessee has now moved rectification application seeking recall MA No.42/Mum/2025 (Arising out of ITA No.3296/Mum/2023) Assessment Year 2018-2019 2 of the aforesaid order. In the sworn affidavit filed by the Director of the Assessee-Company, it has been stated that notice of hearing issued by the Tribunal fixing the hearing on 30/04/2024 and 20/06/2024 were not received by the Assessee. Therefore, the Assessee was not able appear before the Tribunal on the dates fixed. On perusal of the record, we find that notice of hearing fixed for 20/06/2024 has since been received back with the remark insufficient address. The aforesaid supports the contention advanced on behalf of the Assessee. Therefore, in our view, there was sufficient cause for non-appearance on behalf of the Assessee on the hearing fixed on 30/04/2024 and 20/06/2024. Accordingly, we recall the order, dated 29/08/2024, by invoking provisions contained in Rule 24 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1963. 4. In view of the above, the appeal is restored to its original number and the Registry is directed to list the appeal for hearing before regular Bench on 24/09/2025, a date already communicated to both the sides during hearing. The Assessee is directed to take necessary steps to bring on record the present/correct/complete communication address. The Assessee is also directed to file paper-book on or before the date fixed for hearing with advance copy to the other side as per applicable rules. 5. In result, the Miscellaneous Application preferred by the Assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on 01.07.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (Om Prakash Kant) Accountant Member (Rahul Chaudhary) Judicial Member मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated :01.07.2025 Milan, LDC MA No.42/Mum/2025 (Arising out of ITA No.3296/Mum/2023) Assessment Year 2018-2019 3 आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुƅ/ The CIT 4. Ůधान आयकर आयुƅ / Pr.CIT 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सȑािपत Ůित //True Copy// उप/सहायक पंजीकार /(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai "