Harini Podduturi V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 12(1) and Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre

WP/6111/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Harini Podduturi, the petitioner, challenging the legality of notices issued by the Income Tax Department under Section 148 and Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2016-17. The petitioner argued that the notices were issued without following the amended procedural requirements that came into effect on April 1, 2021, which mandate a notice under Section 148A and an opportunity for a hearing. The Income Tax Department, represented by the Senior Standing Counsel, did not dispute the procedural amendment but raised other objections which were not the focus of the court's decision. The court referenced a previous judgment in a similar batch of writ petitions where it had allowed the petitions on the grounds of jurisdictional non-compliance with the amended provisions.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 807557 (HC-TELANGANA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 11-03-2024
• Assessment Year: misc
• Other Referred Cases: WP.No.25903 of 2022 & batch, dated 14.09.2023
• Laws Referred To: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, Section 148 of the Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: VIJAY K PUNNA
• Assessee Lawyers: A V RAGHURAM
• Keywords: Assessment Year 2016-17; Income Tax; Jurisdictional issue; Natural Justice; Writ of Mandamus
• Section: 148; 148A(d)

Judgement Text

"[ 337e ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION NO:6 111 oF 2024 Between: Harini Podduturi, W/o Sri Vijayender Reddy Konda aoed about 41 years' Villa No. os, Rsnoxa\"nE M;i;6;'-6-;.\"laparrv noaa' Koinpailv' Hvderabad - 500014. Rep, by nJ|.'fJn\"'\"'\"0'Cpn ffbfoer' Sri Suresh Reddv Podduturi' Slo Sri Venkat ReddY Podduturi, ...PETITIONER AND 1 The lncome Tax Officer' Ward - 12(1), Aayakar Bhawan' Basheerbagh' Hyderabad - 500004- 2. Assessment Unit, National Face - Department, Room No 4O1 '2'- Delhi less Assessment Centre, lncome Tax ir\"oi, E Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybe pleased to pass an order or direction' especially one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS holding that the order passed by Respondent u/s 148A(d) of the Act' d1.23. 03. 2023 with DIN and Notice No ITBA/AST/F/148A12022- 23t1051202848(1 ) and the notice dated 23 03 2023 issued under section 148 of theActwithDlNandNoticeNoITBA/AST/S/1481t2o22-23/1051203010(1)forthe assessment year 2016- 17, as being illegal, arbitrary and passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice without application of mind' and consequently set aside the same lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the notice issued by the Respondent u/s. .r4g of the Act, dt 23 03. 2023 for the assessment year 2016- 17 with DIN and Notice No lrBA/AST/s/148 1r2o22- 23r1os12o3o1o('1 ) and ail consequentiar proceedings thereto. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. V. RAGHU RAM counsel for the Respondents: M/S vrJHAy K puNNA (sENroR sc FoR rrD) The Court made the following: ORDER 7 f ,,,. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUI{ARAMJT WRIT PETITION No.6111 OF 2024 ORDER:/per Hon'ble Si Justice P.SAM KOSHY) Heard Mr.A.V.Rahu Ram, Iearned counsel for the petitioner ar-rd Mr.Vijhay K. Punna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department for respondents. Perused the material available on record. 2. The instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the following relief: \"to poss dn order or direction especiolly one in the noture ol wRlT OF MANDAMUS holding thot the order possed by Respondent u/s 148Ad of the Act dt 23 03 2023 with DIN ond Notice No TBA/AST/F/148A/2022 2j/10512O28481 ond the notice doted 23 03 2023 issued undet section 148 of the Act with DtN ond Notice No ITBA/AST/S/148 1/2022 2i/10512O30101 lor the dssessment yeor 2016 17 os being illegol orbitrory ond possed in gross violotion of principles of noturol iustice without opplicotion of mind ond consequently set oside the some ond poss such other order s os the Hon'ble Court deems fit ond proper in the interest of justice\". 3. One of the contentions that the petitioner has raised in the present Writ Petition is that under the amended 6J :,7' 2 PSX,J & MrR,J W.P.No.67 71 ol 2024 provisions of the Act which came into effect from Ol.O4.2O2l , the respondents, while proceeding under Section 148 of the Act, were required to issue notice under Section 148A and provide an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. As per the amended provision of law, the proceedings to be drawn are also in a faceiess manner. 4. Whereas, learned counsei for the petitioner contended that, in the instant case, reopening has been initiated by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. In support of his contention, he relied upon the recent judgment rendered by this very Bench in WP.No.259O3 of 2022 & batch, dated 14.O9.2023 wherein this Court disposed of the batch of writ petitions to the limited extent. 5. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Department does not dispute that the said objection was decided in the aforesaid batch of Writ Petitions. However, he further contended that apart from the aforesaid objection, there have been other various objections also which the petitioner has raised in the writ petition. 3 ,x PSK,J & NTR,J W.P.No.6777 of 2024 6. So far as this contention of the learned counsel for the respondent-Department is concerned, this Bench, while disposing of said batch of writ petitions, had taken note of the same at paragraph Nos.37 & 38 which are reproduced herein under: \"37. The preliminary objection raised by the petitioner is sustained and all these writ petitions stands allouLed on this uery juisdictional issue. Since the impugned notices and orders are getting quashed. on the point of juisdiction, u)e are not inclined to proceed further and decide the other issues raised by the petitioner uhich stands reseraed to be raised and contended in art appropiate p roceeding s. \" \"38. Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court had, in the case of Ashish Agan-u.tal, supra, as a one-time meosure exercising the pouers . under Article 142 of the Constitution of Indio, permitted the Reuenue to proceed under ttrc substituted prouisions, ond this Court allowing the petitions only on the proceduraL Jlaut, the right confered on the Reuenue tuould remain reserued to proceed further if they so uant from the stage of the order of the Supreme Court in tte case of Ashish Agaru-tal, supra.\" 7. In view of the same, we are inclined to allow the present writ petition also on similar terms. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands allowed on the objection of the petitioner that the proceedings have not been drawn in accordance with the amended provision but under the un-amended provision which is otherwise not sustainable. I l I i I I a 4 PSK,J & MTR,J W.P.Na.6777 of 2024 To, B. As has been held by this Bench in the aforesaid batch matters, the rights of the parties would stand reserved as is envisaged at paragraph Nos 37 & 38 of the said order passed in the batch of writ petitions' No order as to costs' Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending' if any' shall stand closed' SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I -V SECTION OFFICER The lncome Tax officer, Ward . 12(1), Aayakar Bhawan, Basheerbagh, Hvderabad - 500004. Aisessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre lncome Tax Department, Room No 40i ?;d'Fi;;'t R;;p: Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium' Delhi 5i!\"cc to sri A. V. Raghu Ram, Advocate tqPu-c]. 5'# 66 iI Hi'li. Viinrv (p,\"i' ibiutoR SC ror lrD) [oPUCl Two CD CoPies 1 2 4 5 TJ GJP 6 I HIGH COURT DATED:1110312024 ORDER WP.No.6111 of 2024 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. I 1tl i] T4I ( s. o -* aA o- J 2 B I,IA,r 2024 I (.) : , SJPATCY a 0{, ')9 *- "