INITIATIVE FOR MORAL AND CULTURAL TRAINING FOUNDATION TELANGANA,HYDERABAD V. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

ITA 1015/HYD/2025

AI Insights

The case involves the Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, a charitable organization, which appealed against the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Hyderabad. The CIT(E) had rejected the foundation's application for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing that the activities of the foundation were not commensurate with its objectives. The foundation contested this decision, arguing that the CIT(E) did not adequately consider the evidence of its charitable activities provided during the proceedings. The Tribunal found that the CIT(E)'s order was a non-speaking one and violated the principles of natural justice, leading to the decision to remand the case for a fresh evaluation.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 826914 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-01-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Assessment Year: 2024-2025
• Appeal Filed On: 11-06-2025
• Other Referred Cases: Vidya Shankar Jaiswal vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Ambikapur
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: T. CHAITANYA KUMAR
• Keywords: Set aside; Opportunity of being heard; Principle of natural justice; Procedural lapse
• Section: 80G

Judgement Text

" ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 1 of 6 आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Įी ͪवजय पाल राव, उपाÚ य¢ एवं Įी मधुसूदन सावͫडया, लेखा सदè य क े सम¢ । Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1015/Hyd/2025 (िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2024-25) Initiative For Moral And Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad PAN:AACTI2564F Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधाŊįरती Ȫारा/Assessee by: Advocate T. Chaitanya Kumar राज̾ व Ȫारा/Revenue by:: Smt. U. Mini Chandran, CIT (DR) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 22/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/01/2026 आदेश/ORDER Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This appeal is filed by Initiative For Moral And Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), (“Ld. CIT(E)”) dated 19.03.2025 for the A.Y 2024-25. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 2 of 6 2. At the outset, it is observed that there is a delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay, explaining the reasons for such delay. We have perused the condonation petition and considered the submissions made by the Learned Authorized Representative (“Ld. AR”) as well as the Learned Departmental Representative (“Ld. DR”). Further, keeping in view the principle laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of Vidya Shankar Jaiswal vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Ambikapur in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 26310 26311/2024, dated 31st January, 2025, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that a justice-oriented and liberal approach should be taken while dealing with the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay in filing of the appeal, we are inclined to condone the delay of 11 days in filing of this appeal before us and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. The order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Hyderabad rejecting the application for registration u/s 80G of the I.T. Act is erroneous, unjustified, and contrary to the facts and the law. 2. The rejection of application by the Learned commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Hyderabad of the application under Section B0G(5) of the Income Tax Act is erroneous, unjustified, and contrary to the facts and the law' 3. The order passed by the Learned commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad, rejecting the application for Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 3 of 6 registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide DIN: ITBA/EXM/F/EXM4512024- 251L074701894(1) dated Lg.O3.ZO25, is erroneous, arbitrary, unjustified, and against the principles of natural justice. 4. The Learned CIT (Exemptions) rejected the appellant's registration under Section 80G, stating that the trust's activities are not commensurate with its registered objectives. However, the appellant asserts that the Learned CIT(Exemptions) failed to properly understand the activities conducted by the trust. 5. The rejection of the application based on an observation that \"no substantial charitable activity is being carried out\" is contrary to the facts and unsupported by any findings on record, especially when the trust has submitted evidence of its ongoing charitable initiatives' 6. The action of the CIT (Exemptions) in rejecting the application without affording a reasonable opportunity for persona! hearing or clarification, especially after submission of documents, violates the principles of natural justice and fair procedure. 7. The action of the Learned CIT (Exemptions) in rejecting the application u/s 80G without invoking condonation provisions or offering guidance on remedying the procedural lapse is arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice. 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, or withdraw any of the grounds at the time of hearing.” 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable organization. It had filed an application in Form No. 10AB seeking approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) before the Ld. CIT(E). After considering the submissions made by the assessee, the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee by order dated 19.03.2025 in Form No. 10AD, contending that the activity of the assessee are not Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 4 of 6 commensurate with its objects and the same are not as per the provisions of section 80G of the Act. 5. Aggrieved with the order of Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. AR submitted that, during the course of proceedings, the Ld. CIT(E) issued notices to the assessee on 3.12.2024 and 17.02.2025. The assessee had duly complied with by the notice of the Ld. CIT (E) dated 17.02.2025 on 27.02.2025 (page nos.2 to 20 of the Paper Book). In response to the notice, the assessee submitted all requisite documents including the Trust Deed, activity reports, photographs etc., substantiating its charitable activities. He further submitted that, the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee without pointing out any specific deficiency in the documents furnished by the assessee. It was also submitted that the impugned order is a non-speaking order, violating principles of natural justice. The Ld. AR prayed that the matter be remanded back to the Ld. CIT(E) to consider the submissions afresh and pass a reasoned and speaking order, after giving the assessee an effective opportunity of being heard. 6. The Ld. DR supported the order of the Ld. CIT(E), stating that the Ld. CIT(E) has jurisdiction to assess the genuineness of activities before granting approval under Section 80G of the Act. However, she fairly agreed that the impugned order does not record any specific finding or reasoning in relation to the material placed on record. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 5 of 6 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee had responded to the notice dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Ld. CIT(E) and furnished relevant documents substantiating its charitable activities. These include the Trust Deed, activity reports and photographs (page nos. 2 to 20 of the paper book). On perusal of the impugned order passed in Form No. 10AD, we find that the Ld. CIT(E) has not specifically referred to any of the documents filed by the assessee or given any finding as to why the evidence was insufficient. The order merely states in a cryptic manner that the activity of the assessee are not commensurate with its objects and the same are not as per the provisions of section 80G of the Act. A non-speaking order rejecting statutory approval, without dealing with the submissions and evidence furnished, is violative of the principles of natural justice. In view of the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and restore the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for de novo adjudication. The Ld. CIT(E) is directed to examine all the documents submitted by the assessee, grant an opportunity of personal hearing, permit filing of any additional documents, and thereafter pass a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1015 of 2025 Initiative for Moral and Cultural Training Foundation Telangana, Hyderabad Page 6 of 6 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 7th January 2026. Sd/- Sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) VICE PRESIDENT (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Hyderabad, dated 7th January 2026. Vinodan/sps Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 NITIATIVE FOR MORAL AND CULTURAL TRAINING FOUNDATION TELANGANA E Block Flat No.101 Aditya Empress Towers, Shaikpet Nala, Tolichowki, Golconda Post, Hyderabad 500008 2 CIT (E) Aayakar Bhavan, Opp: LB Stadium, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad 500004 3 Pr. CIT – (Exemptions) Hyderabad 4 DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 5 Guard File By Order Printed from counselvise.com "