The iTO, Ward-2(3), Trivandrum V. M/s.Vithura Service Co-op Bank Ltd, Trivandrum

ITA 05/COCH/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4973 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 04-01-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: BINDHU A S
• Keywords: Question of law; Competent authority
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 05 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 201 3 - 201 4 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3) TRIVANDRUM . VS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.1048, VITHURA P.O. NEDUMANGAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 561. PAN : AAAAV6101G . (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 06 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2013 - 2014 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), RANGE 2 TRIVANDRUM. VS. M/S.CHAYAM SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, BANK BUILDING, CHETTACHAL POST THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 551. PAN : AAAAC6909C. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 07 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2013 - 2014 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 KOLLAM. VS. M/S.PUNALURSERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.2634, SIVAN KOIL ROAD PUNALUR, KOLLAM PAN : AAGAS6534C. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT S BY : S MT . BINDHU A.S., SR.DR RESPONDENT BY : --- NONE --- DATE OF HEARING : 01.08 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01 .0 8 .2018 O R D E R PER BENCH TH E S E APPEAL S AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST SEPARATE ORDER S OF THE CIT(A). THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IS 201 3 - 201 4 . ITA NO. 05 / COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD . & ORS. 2 2. THE SOLITARY ISSUE RAISED IN TH E S E APPEAL S IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S. 80P(2)( A ) (I ) OF THE I.T.ACT. 3. BRIEFLY STATED THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ASSESSEE S ARE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIET IES REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 3 - 1 4 , THE ASSESSEE S HAD FILED RETURN OF INCOME DECLARING `NIL INCOME AFTER CLAIMING DEDUCTION U/S. 80P (2)(A)(I) OF THE I. T. ACT. THE ASSESSMENT S U/S. 143(3) OF THE AC T WERE COMPLETED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER, BY DENYING THE DEDUCTION U/S. 80P(2) (A)(I) OF THE I. T. ACT. THE REASONING OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S. 80P (2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT WAS THAT THE ASSESSEE S WERE PRIMARILY ENGAGED IN T HE BUSINESS OF BANKING AND THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE I. T. ACT WHICH WAS INSERTED WITH EFFECT FROM 0 1 .0 4 . 2007, THE ASSESSEE S WERE NOT ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S. 80P(2) (A)(I) OF THE I.T. ACT. 4. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER S OF THE ASSESSMENT, THE ASSESSEE S PREFERRED APPEAL S BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A), FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (384 ITR 490) HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE S ARE ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S. 80P(2) OF THE I.T. ACT AND DIRECTED THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO ALLOW DEDUCTION U/ S. 80P OF THE ACT. ITA NO. 05 / COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD . & ORS. 3 5. AGGR IEVED BY THE ORDER S OF THE CI T(A), THE REVENUE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL S BEFORE US. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESEN TATIVE RELIED ON THE GROUNDS RAISED. NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE S , HOWEVER, WE PROCEED TO DISPOSE OFF THE APPEAL S ON MERITS. 6. WE HAVE HEARD THE LEARNED DR AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. ADMITTEDLY, THE ASSESSEE S ARE PRIMARY AGRICULT URAL CREDIT SOCIET ES REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. (SUPRA) HAD HELD THAT A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY, REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 IS ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION U/ S. 80P(2). THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WAS CONSIDERING THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW: A) WH ETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE TRIBUNAL IS CORRECT IN LAW IN DECIDING AGAINST THE ASSESSEE, THE ISSUE REGARDING ENTITLEMENT FOR EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 80P, IGNORING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY? 6.1 IN CONSIDERING THE ABOVE QUESTION OF LAW, THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT RENDERED THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: '15. APPELLANTS IN THESE DIFFERENT APPEALS ARE INDISPUTABLY SOCIETIES REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1969, FOR SHORT KCS ACT, AND THE BYE - LAWS OF EACH OF THEM, AS MADE AVAILABLE TO THIS COURT AS PART OF THE PAPER BOOKS, CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY ITA NO. 05 / COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD . & ORS. 4 AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THAT ACT THE PARLIAMENT HAVING DEFINED THE TERM 'CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY' FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE BR ACT WITH REFERENCE TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE REGISTRATION OF A SOCIETY UNDER ANY STATE LAW RELATING TO CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES FOR THE TIME BEING; IT CANNOT BUT BE TAKEN THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE SOCIETIES SO REGISTERED UNDER THE STATE LAW AND ITS OBJECTS HAVE TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS THOSE WHIC H HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SUCH STATE LAW. THIS, WE VISUALISE AS DUE RECIPROCATIVE LEGISLATIVE EXERCISE BY THE PARLIAMENT RECOGNISING THE PREDOMINANCE OF DECISIONS RENDERED UNDER THE RELEVANT STATE LAW. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER . ALL THE APPELLANTS HAVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT IT HAS NECESSARILY TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND T O PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE 'OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS AD AND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT O R A MUNICIPALITY. THIS IS THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE DEFINITION CLAUSE IN SECTION 2(OAA) OF THE KCS ACT THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUE OR SUCH MATTER RELATING TO SUCH APPLICANTS. 16. THE POSITION OF LAW BEING AS ABOVE WITH REFERE NCE TO THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS , THE APPELLANTS HAD SHOWN TO THE AUTHORITIES AND THE TRIBUNAL THAT THEY ARE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES IN TERMS OF CLAUSE (CCIV) OF SECTION 5 OF THE BR ACT HAVING REGARD TO THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF EACH OF THE APPELLANTS. IT IS ALSO CLEAR FROM THE MATERIALS ON RECORD THAT THE BYE - LAWS OF EACH OF THE APPELLANTS DO NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS MEMBER, EXCEPT MAY BE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISO TO SUB - CLAUSE 2 OF SECT ION 5(CCIV) OF THE BR ACT. THE DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE TRIBUNAL WHICH ARE IMPEACHED IN THESE APPEALS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY ITA NO. 05 / COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD . & ORS. 5 FINDING OF FACT TO THE EFFECT THAT THE BYE - LAWS OF ANY OF THE APPELLANT OR ITS CLASSIFICATION BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT IS ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WE HAVE STATED HEREIN ABOVE. FOR THIS REASON, IT CANNOT BUT BE HELD THAT THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT BY VIRTUE OF SUB - SECTION 4 OF THAT SECT; ON. IN THIS VI EW OF THE MATTER, THE APPEALS SUCCEED. 17. IN THE LIGHT OF THE AFORESAID, WE ANSWER SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION A IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS AND HOLD THAT THE TRIBUNAL ERRED IN LAW IN DECIDING THE ISSUE REGARDING THE ENTITLEMENT OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 80P AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. WE HOLD THAT THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES, REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THAT ACT INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 6.2 IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE JU RISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. (SUPRA), WE HOLD THAT THE ASSESSEE - SOCIET IES ARE ENTITLE D TO THE BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION U/ S. 80P(2) OF THE ACT. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 01 ST DAY OF AUGUST , 2018 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 01 ST AUGUST , 2018 . DEVDAS* ITA NO. 05 / COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. VITHURA SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD . & ORS. 6 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM . 4. THE PR.CIT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6 . GUARD FILE.