Rajeev Paul, Joda V. Dy. CIT, CPC, Banglore

ITA 101/CTK/2022

AI Insights

This case involves an appeal by the assessee, Rajeev Paul, against an order from the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, concerning the assessment year 2017-18. The appeal was heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack 'SMC' Bench. During the hearing, the assessee's advocate decided not to pursue the appeal further, indicating a preference to file an application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act instead. As a result, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 300449 (ITAT-CUTTACK)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-04-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2023
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 26-05-2022
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 154

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BEFORE Rajeev Paul, At Keonjhar PAN/GIR No. (Appellant This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A),NFAC, Delhi, 22/1037442609(1) 2. Shri J.M.Patnaik, ld AR S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue. 3. At the time of hearing, ld AR submitted that he did not wish to this appeal as he propose Act. As the ld AR has submitted IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK ‘SMC’ BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL ITA No.101/CTK/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18 Rajeev Paul, At-Joda, Dist: Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore. PAN/GIR No.APDPP 0151 M (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Assessee by : Shri J.M.Patnaik, Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR Date of Hearing : 20/04 Date of Pronouncement : 20/0 O R D E R This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld ,NFAC, Delhi, dated 2.12.2021 in Appeal No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021 22/1037442609(1) for the assessment year 2017-18 Shri J.M.Patnaik, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue. At the time of hearing, ld AR submitted that he did not wish to this appeal as he proposes to file an application under se Act. As the ld AR has submitted that the assessee desires to withdraw the Page1 | 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, , CUTTACK JUDICIAL MEMBER DCIT, CPC, Bangalore. Respondent) J.M.Patnaik, S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR 4/2023 /04/2023 This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021- for the assessee and Shri At the time of hearing, ld AR submitted that he did not wish to press to file an application under section 154 of the the assessee desires to withdraw the ITA No.101/CTK/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18 Page2 | 2 appeal, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is dismissed as not pressed. 4. In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 20/04/2023. Sd/- (George Mathan) JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 20/04/2023 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : By order Sr.Pvt.secretary ITAT, Cuttack 1. The Appellant : Rajeev Paul, At-Joda, Dist: Keonjhar 2. The Respondent: Rajeev Paul, At-Joda, Dist: Keonjhar 3. The CIT(A)-, NFAC, Delhi 4. Pr.CIT-, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy//