SMT. SUNITA SUWALKA, KOTA V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

ITA 1021/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6081 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-09-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 04-09-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJENDRA SINGH

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,A JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 1020 & 1021/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 & 2009-10 SMT. SUNITA SUWALKA 816, MATAJI KA MANDIR, WARD NO. 27, KUNHARI, KOTA CUKE VS. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-03, JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AUYPS4421P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MANISH AGRAWAL (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SH. RAJENDRA SINGH (CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 10/09/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13/09/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THESE ARE TWO APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINS T THE ORDERS OF LD. CIT(A)-04, JAIPUR ALL DATED 09.05.2018 FOR ASSE SSMENT YEARS 2007- 08 & 2009-10 RESPECTIVELY. 2. THE LD A/R HAS STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FIL ED A PETITION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020 TO SETTLE THE AFORES AID MATTER AND THE SAID PETITION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED ON 16.02.2021 & 05.03.2021 BY THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND WHICH HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT WAS ACCORDINGLY R EQUESTED THAT THE ASSESSEE MAY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APP EAL. ITA NOS. 1020 & 1021/JP/2018 SMT. SUNITA SUWALKA, KOTA VS. DCIT, JAIPUR 2 3. THE LD. DR IS HEARD WHO DID NOT RAISE ANY SPECI FIC OBJECTION IN ACCEPTING THE SAID PRAYER OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE IS ACCEPTED AND THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 13/09/2021. SD/- SD/- LANHI XKSLKBZ FOE FLAG ;KNO ( SANDEEP GOSAIN ) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 13/09/2021. *GANESH KUMAR VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SMT. SUNITA SUWALKA, KOTA 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-03, JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NOS. 1020 & 1021/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR