, - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH A BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 1037/AHD/2012 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 ACIT, CIR.4 BARODA. VS M/S.ORG INFORMATICS LTD. 321, ABHISHEK COMPLEX AKSHAR CHOWK, OLD PADRA ROAD BARODA 390 020. PAN : AACCS 9395 K / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI S.K. DEV, SR.DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SANJAY R. SHAH, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 10/10/2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10 /10/2018 O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS REVENUES APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD.CIT(A)-III, BARODA DATE D 29.2.2012 PASSED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. SOLE ISSUE RAISED IN THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE LD.CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING ADDITION OF RS.37,80,260/- MA DE BY THE AO ON ACCOUNT OF FORFEITURE OF SHARE WARRANTS. 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE F OR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINA BLE IN VIEW OF RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3/2018 DATED 11.7.2018 RESTRICTING THE FILLING OF THE ITA NO.1037/AHD/2012 - 2 - APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.20 LAKH. THE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ADDITION IS BELOW RS.20 LAKH S, THEREFORE, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. LD.DR DID NO T DISPUTE THE SAME AND SUBMITTED THAT THE ISSUE IS LEFT TO THE TRIBUNAL TO BE DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 4. WE FIND THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS PRESEN TED ON 15.5.2012. ON 8.1.2016 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARIN G NO. 3 OF 2018 UNDER FILE NO.F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT) PROHIB ITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL TO THE TRIBUN AL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. THE INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THEREBY, THESE INSTRU CTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRESENT CASE, ADDITIO N CONTESTED BY THE REVENUE IS RS.37,80,260/-. THE TAX EFFECT ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED MINUS THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD S UCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE I SSUE AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS FILED, IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. FURTHER, THE CASE OF THE REVENUE ALSO DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS P ROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR. THUS, KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR AND P ROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. IT IS ACCORDI NGLY DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IT IS OBSERVED THAT IN CASE ON RE-VERIFICA TION AT THE END OF THE AO IT COMES TO THE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT I S MORE OR REVENUES CASE FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN TH E CIRCULAR, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBU NAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD PRESCRIBED ITA NO.1037/AHD/2012 - 3 - IN THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF TH E REVENUE IS DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 TH OCTOBER, 2018. SD/- SD/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER