1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH (SMC) BEFORE SHRI N. BARATHVAJA SANKAR VICE PRESIDENT I.T.A NO. 1041/CHANDI/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 SMT. SEEMA CHHABRA V THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOM E W/O SH. RAKESH KUMAR TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE IV CHHABRA, CIVIL LINES LUDHIANA LUDHIANA PAN: AATPC 8018 P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: S/SHRI SUDHIR SEHGAL & ASHOK GOYAL RESPONDENT BY: SHRI N.K. SAINI ORDER THIS IS AN APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, SMT. S EEMA CHHABRA OF LUDHIANA FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2000-01 AGAINST THE AP PELLATE ORDER DATED 24.5.2010 OF LD. CIT(A)-I, LUDHIANA, CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF RS. 40,000/- MADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER BY DISALLOWING THE EX PENDITURE/ DEDUCTION CLAIMED IN RESPECT OF INTEREST PAID. 2 AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSES SEE SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS INSTRUCTIONS FROM HIS CLIENT TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEA L AND ACCORDINGLY HE HAS MADE AN ENDORSEMENT TO THE EFFECT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL ON BEHALF OF HIS CLIENT, ON THE FACE OF GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BEFORE US. 3 I HAVE ALSO HEARD THE LD. D.R. FOR THE REVENUE WH O HAD NO OBJECTION FOR ASSESSEES WITHDRAWING THE APPEAL. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER, SINCE THE ASSESSEE IS WITHDRAWING THE APPEAL, I DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. 2 4 IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 30.8.2010. (N. BARATHVAJA SANKAR) VICE PRESIDENT DATED: .08.2010 SURESH COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT/THE C IT(A)/ THE DR