1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.K. PANDA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1044/PN/2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08) RAJENDRA PANNALAL BORA, A/P. GOGALGAON, TAL. SHRIRAMPUR, DIST. AHMEDNAGAR-413713. .. APPELLANT PAN NO. AGNPB 3855H VS. DCIT, AHMEDNAGAR CIRCLE, AHMEDNAGAR .. RESPONDEN T ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SRI S.K. SINGH/SRI RAJIV JAIN DATE OF HEARING : 24-08-2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24 -08-2012 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 27-01-11 OF THE CIT(A)-I, PUNE RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007 -08. 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH RPAD NONE APPE ARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE NAME OF THE ASSESSEE WAS CALLED. NO PETITION S EEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE WAS FILED. THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT ON THE PART OF THE ASSESSEE SH OWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECIS ION OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTI PLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE DEC ISION OF HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT REPORTED IN 213 ITR 480 WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. HOWEVER, IF THE ASSESSEE THROUGH PROPE R APPLICATION CAN SATISFY THE BENCH FOR NON- APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING, THE TRIBUNAL MAY AT ITS DISCRETION RECALL THE ORDER. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF, I.E. ON 24-08-12 SD/- SD/- (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTA NT MEMBER PUNE DATED: THE 24 TH AUGUST 2012 SATISH COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. DEPARTMENT 3. CIT(A) I PUNE 4. THE D.R, B PUNE BENCH 5. GUARD FILE BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, PUNE BENCHES, PUNE 2