Shreyansh Corporation, Surat V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(4), Surat

ITA 105/AHD/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 111 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1940 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-03-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 12-01-2017
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ILLA P ARMAR; SHRISRINIVAST BIDADRI
• Assessee Lawyers: MRS SNEHAPADHIAR
• Section: 271(1)(c)

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH,SURAT [ , , BEFORE SHRI C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NOS.103 & 104/AHD./2017/SRT [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2002-03& 2003-04 M/S. SAMARTH INDIA, 4408, KOHINOOR MARKET, RING ROAD, SURAT 395 002. [PAN:AAPFS 9804D] VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(4), SURAT. ( / APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) . / ITA NOS.105 & 106/AHD./2017/SRT [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2002-03& 2003-04 M/S. SHREYANSH CORPORATION, 4409, KOHINOOR TEXTILE MARKET, RING ROAD, SURAT. [PAN: AAPFS 9806B] VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(4), SURAT. ( / APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI VIJAY MEHTA, C.A & MRS. SNEHAPADHIAR, C.A /RESPONDENT BY : SHRISRINIVAST.BIDADRI, CIT-DR & SMT. ILLAPARMAR, SR. D.R /DATE OF HEARING : 16-02-2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23-03-2018 / ORDER PERC.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER : 2 ITA NOS.103 TO 106/AHD./2017/SRT (A.Y: 2002-03& 2003-04) M/S. SAMARTH INDIA &SHREYANSH CORPORATION ABOVE CAPTIONED APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, SURAT (FOR SHORT CIT(A)) BY WHICH PENALTY IMPOSED ON BOTH THE ASSESSEES U/S. 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT THE ACT) HAS BEEN CONFIRMED FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR (A.Y) 2002-03 AND 2003-04. 2. SINCE BY THE SEPARATE ORDER PASSED TODAY, IN THE RELEVANT QUANTUM APPEALS I.E., ITA NO.103/AHD/2017 TO 106/AHD/2017 FOR A.Y 2002-03 & 2003-04 ALONG WITH OTHER 7 APPEALS (TOTAL 11 APPEALS) AFTER CONDONING THE DELAY IN FILING APPEAL BEFORE TRIBUNAL, WE HAVE RESTORED ALL THE MATTERS TO THE FILE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) FOR A FRESH ADJUDICATION AFTER ALLOWING DUE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE THEREFORE, THE PENALTY IMPOSED BY THE AO AND CONFIRMED BY THE LD. CIT(A) IN ALL THESE FOUR APPEALS DOES NOT SURVIVE AS THE ADDITIONS ARE NOT IN EXISTENCE AFTER RESTORATION OF CASE TO THE ASSESSMENT STAGE TO THE FILE OF A.O. THEREFORE, PENALTY IMPOSED BY THE AO U/S. 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT WHICH HAS BEEN UPHELD BY THE LD. CIT(A) IN ALL THESE FOUR APPEALS CANNOT BE HELD AS SUSTAINABLE AND WE DIRECT THE AO TO DELETE THE SAME. 3. HOWEVER, BEFORE WE PART WITH THE ORDER MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IN THE EVENT IF IN THE REASSESSMENT ORDERPASSED IN PURSUANT TO THE TRIBUNAL ORDER THE AO MAKES ADDITIONS AND AS PER FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES IT IS NECESSARY AND REQUIRED TO INITIATE PENALTY PROCEEDINGS U/S. 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT OR ANY OFTHE RELEVANT PROVISION THEN, THE AO SHALL NOT BE PREVENTED IN INITIATING THE 3 ITA NOS.103 TO 106/AHD./2017/SRT (A.Y: 2002-03& 2003-04) M/S. SAMARTH INDIA &SHREYANSH CORPORATION PENALTY PROCEEDINGS AND HE SHALL BE EMPOWERED TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER AS PER PROVISIONS OF THE ACT. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL FOUR APPEALS ARE ALLOWED WITH THE DIRECTIONS AND LIBERTY TO THE AO AS MENTIONED HEREIN ABOVE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS DAY OF 23 RD MARCH, 2018. SD/- SD/- / SURAT ; DATED : 23 RD MARCH, 2018 EDN / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT; 2. / THE RESPONDENT; 3. ( ) / THE CIT(APPEALS) - 2 , SURAT ; 4. PR. CIT-1,SURAT ; 5 . , , / DR, ITAT,SURAT; 6 [ / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR , / ITAT, SURAT ( ) (O.P.MEENA) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( ) C.M.GARG /JUDICIAL MEMBER