Mrs. Razieh Khaleeli, CHENNAI V. ITO, CHENNAI

ITA 1062/CHNY/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 135 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8223 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-09-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 29-06-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: TAPAS KUMAR DUTTA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH A SMC, CHENNAI SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.TA. NO.1062/MDS/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 MRS. RAZIEH KHALEELI, NO. 162-C, GREAMS ROAD, CHENNAI 600 006. [PAN:AQKPK5241P] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD XV (2), CHENNAI 600 034. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI TAPAS KUMAR DUTTA O R D E R PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDE R PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) XII, CHENNAI 600 034 DATED 31.03.2010 FO R THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE [AD ON RECORD], THE A SSESSEE DID NOT CHOOSE TO BE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED THEREFORE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE A SSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND F OLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF M ULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION . ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. 1062/MDS/10 1062/MDS/10 1062/MDS/10 1062/MDS/10 2 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08.09.20 10. SD/- (U.B.S. BEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 08.09.2010. VM/- COPY TO : APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/CIT(A)- /CIT, /DR