NAVEEN BASOTIA, Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 107/JPR/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5615 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-01-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 11-02-2014
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P P MEENA

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA MKW0 VTQZU YKY LSUH ] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJY PAL RAO, JM & DR. ARJUN LAL SAIN I, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 107/JP/2014 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 SHRI NAVEEN BASOTIA, C-3, MADHUBAN COLONY, TONK PHATAK, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ACQPB8163P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI P.P. MEENA (J.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 07/11/2017 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 07/11/2017 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER LD. 18.11.2013 OF CIT(A)-II, JAIPUR FOR THE A.Y. 2007-0 8. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. THIS APPEAL WAS EARLIER LIS TED FOR HEARING ON 06.11.2017 BUT NONE HAD APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE A SSESSEE EVEN ON 06.11.2017, THEREFORE, TO GIVE ONE MORE OPPORTUNITY TO THE ASSESSEE ITA NO.107/JP/2014 SH. NAVEEN BASOTIA VS. ITO 2 THIS APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO TODAY I.E. ON 07.11.20 17. IT TRANSPIRES FROM THE RECORD THAT ON 04.09.2017, THE LD. AR OF T HE ASSESSEE APPEARED AND DULY NOTED THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING. D ESPITE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE NOTED DOWN NEXT DATE OF HEARING BUT NONE H AD APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON 06.11.2017 AS WELL AS ON 07.11.2017. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS APPARENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NO T INTERESTED IN PERUSING AND PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD ., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH C OURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 22 3 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMI SSED IN LIMINE FOR NON PROSECUTION AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07/11/2017. SD/- SD/- DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 07/11/2017. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI NAVEEN BASOTIA, C-3, MADHUBAN COLONY, TONK PHATAK, JAIPUR. ITA NO.107/JP/2014 SH. NAVEEN BASOTIA VS. ITO 3 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD 6(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 107/JP/2014} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR