M/s Aggarwal Plastochem (P) Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 1070/DEL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4197 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-04-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2013
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 28-02-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUSHA KHURANA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH A NEW DELHI) BEFORE G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, HON'BLE VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI RAJPAL YADAV: HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 1070/DEL/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 AGGARWAL PLASTOCHEM (P) LTD., VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER , C/O M/S. RRA TAXINDIA, WARD-1(2), D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. (PAN: AACCA8330Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI ANUSHA KHURAN A, SR.DR ORDER PER RAJPAL YADAV: JUDICIAL MEMBER PER RAJPAL YADAV: JUDICIAL MEMBER PER RAJPAL YADAV: JUDICIAL MEMBER PER RAJPAL YADAV: JUDICIAL MEMBER THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US AGAINST THE OR DER OF THE LEARNED CIT(APPEALS) DATED 24.12.2010 PASSED FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. THIS APPEAL WAS PRESENTED IN THE ITAT ON 28.2.2011. THE REGISTRY HAD ISSUED AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-CUM-NOTICE TO THE PERSON WHO PRESEN TED THE APPEAL. IN THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-CUM-NOTICE, DATE OF HEARING WAS INF ORMED TO THE ASSESSEE AS 27.4.2011. THIS DATE WAS DULY NOTICED BY THE PER SON WHO PRESENTED THE APPEAL. HIS SIGNATURES ARE AVAILABLE ON THE FILE. I NSPITE OF NOTICE, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE FILED ANY PAPER BOOK NOR APPEARED FOR PURS UING THE APPEAL. IT EMERGES OUT FROM THE RECORD THAT ASSESSMENT ORDER W AS PASSED EX PARTE AS NO 2 ONE APPEARED BEFORE THE ASSESSING OFFICER. SIMILARL Y, NO ONE APPEARED BEFORE THE LEARNED CIT(APPEALS). IT IS AGAIN AN EX PARTE ORDER. FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSEE, IT TRANSPIRES THAT IT IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISM ISSED. DECISION PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 27.04.2011 (G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA ) ( RAJPAL YADAV ) VICE-PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 27/04/2011 MOHAN LAL COPY FORWARDED TO: 1) APPELLANT 2) RESPONDENT 3) CIT 4) CIT(APPEALS) 5) DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR