Gurpreet Singh Gill, Bakhatgarh V. ITO, W-1, Barnala

ITA 1073/CHANDI/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4643 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 5 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2020
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 16-08-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MEENAKSHI VOHRA CIT

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH SMC CHANDIGARH !', # BEFORE: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JM ./ ITA NOS. 1073 & 1074/CHD/2018 / A.YS : 2012-13 & 2013-14 SHRI GURPREET SINGH GILL, S/O SHRI HARPAL SINGH, VPO BAKHATGARH. VS THE ITO, WARD-1, BARNALA. ./ PAN NO: ALTPG2445H / APPELLANT / RESPONDENT ! ' / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEEPAK AGGARWAL, ADVOCATE # ! ' / REVENUE BY : SMT. MEENAKSHI VOHRA, ADDL. CIT $ % ! &/ DATE OF HEARING : 10.02.2021 '()* ! &/ D ATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11.02.2021 HEARING CONDUCTED VIA WEBEX $%/ ORDER BY THE PRESENT APPEALS, THE ASSESSEE ASSAILS THE C ORRECTNESS OF THE SEPARATE ORDER DATED 19.06.2018 OF CIT(A), P ATIALA PERTAINING TO 2012-13 AND 2013-14 ASSESSMENT YEAR R ESPECTIVELY ON VARIOUS GROUNDS. 2. HOWEVER AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD. AR SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS AVAILED OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VI SHWAS SCHEME, 2020 BY WAY OF FILING SEPARATE APPLICATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT BY ISSUANCE OF FORM NO. 3. COPIES FILED. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, RELYING UPON THE AP PLICATIONS ITA 1073&1074CHD/2018 A.Y.2012-13 & 2013-14 PAGE 2 OF 2 RECEIVED IN THIS OFFICE ON 01.02.2021 PRAYER FOR WI THDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS IS MADE. 3. THE LD. SR.DR SMT. MEENAKSHI VOHRA ON A PERUSAL OF RECORD HAD NO OBJECTION TO THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. I HAVE HEARD THE SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MAT ERIAL ON RECORD. IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PECULIAR FACTS AND CI RCUMSTANCES CONSIDERING THE RECORD AND THE SUBMISSIONS, THE APP EALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SAID ORDER WA S PRONOUNCED AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING ITSELF IN THE PRESEN CE OF THE PARTIES VIA WEBEX. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE D ISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 11 TH FEBRUARY,2021. SD/- ( !' ) (DIVA SINGH) # / JUDICIAL MEMBER ' ( / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. / CIT 4. ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER, / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR