CHENNIAPPA GOUNDER DURAISAMY, ERODE V. DCIT,CIRCLE-1, , ERODE

ITA 108/CHNY/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1655 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-06-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2024
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 15-01-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 69A

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी एसएस िवʷनेũ रिव, Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी जगदीश, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ । Before Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member & Shri Jagadish, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.108/Chny/2024 िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Chenniappa Gounder Duraisamy, 2/144, Mettupudur Village, Vijayamangalam, Perundurai Taluk, Erode 638 056. [PAN: ACGPD9439A] Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1, Erode. (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate, Erode. ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 12.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 14.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 17.11.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. At the outset, we note that the case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny as detailed in para 1 & 2 of the assessment order. The Assessing Officer asked the details of transaction as detailed in page 4 of the assessment order relating to sale of land. The Assessing Officer I.T.A. No.108/Chny/24 2 clearly held that the assessee could not provide any further details in respect of said sale of land transaction, which is clear from page 4 of the assessment order. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer in the absence of any evidence supporting the claim of the assessee. 3. Before us, the ld. AR placed on record paper book containing copy of various sale deeds. The ld. AR submits that the assessee could not file the same before the Assessing Officer and even before the ld. CIT(A) due to the circumstances beyond his control. The assessee, now, collected every details of sale of land transaction filed in the form of paper book and prayed to remand the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication by considering the copy of various sale deeds filed before the Tribunal. 4. The ld. DR Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT did not dispute the same. 5. Admittedly, details of sale of land transaction were not available before the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, taking into consideration the submissions of the ld. AR and relevant evidences filed in the form of paper book before the Tribunal, we deem it proper to remit the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration I.T.A. No.108/Chny/24 3 and the assessee is directed to file all the evidence in support of his claim for consideration. 6. The next issue raised in ground No. 4 is relating to the addition made under section 69A of the Act amounting to ₹.3,40,000/- is dismissed as not pressed. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 14 th June, 2024 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (JAGADISH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 14.06.2024 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 5. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.