, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH: KOL KATA () BEFORE . . , ! '# '# '# '# /AND ' # , ! ) [BEFORE SHRI S. V. MEHROTRA, AM & SRI MAHAVIR SINGH , JM] #$ #$ #$ #$ / I.T.A NO. 1080/KOL/2011 %& ''( %& ''( %& ''( %& ''(/ // / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 SRI UTTAM KUMAR TALUKDAR VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER , WD-1, RAIGANJ (PAN: ABVPT 8205 A) (*+ /APPELLANT ) (,-*+/ RESPONDENT ) DATE OF HEARING: 28.12.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28.12.2011 FOR THE APPELLANT: N O N E FOR THE RESPONDENT: SHRI N. DUTTA GUPTA . / ORDER PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM ( ' # ' # ' # ' #, , , , ! ! ! ! ) THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF CIT(A), JALPAIGURI IN APPEAL NO.14/RNJ/CIT(A)/JAL/09-10 DATED 11.05.2011. ASSESS MENT WAS FRAMED BY ITO, WARD-1, RAIGANJ U/S. 147/143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 VIDE HIS ORDER DATED 30.12. 2009. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 28.12.2011 . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING DESPITE THE DATE NOTED BY TH E REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE SHRI SAJAL GANGULY ON 11.08.2011. NO ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED. IT MEANS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THIS APPEA L AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 5. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- . . ! ' '' ' # # # # , ! (S. V. MEHROTRA) (MAHAVIR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER ( / / / /) )) ) DATED : 28 TH DECEMBER, 2011 '01 %23 4' JD.(SR.P.S.) 2 ITA 1080/K/2011 UTTAM KUMAR TALUKDAR A.Y.06-07 . 5 ,6 76'8- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1 . *+ / APPELLANT SHRI UTTAM KUMAR TALUKDAR, C/O D. J. SH AH & CO. KALYAN BHAVAN, 2, ELGIN ROAD, KOLKATA-700 020 2 ,-*+ / RESPONDENT, ITO, WARD-1, RAIGANJ. 3 . .% ( )/ THE CIT(A), JALPAIGURI 4. .% / CIT, JALPAIGURI 5 . '> ,% / DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA -6 ,/ TRUE COPY, .%?/ BY ORDER, #3 /ASSTT. REGISTRAR .