SONAL ENTERPRISES, THANE V. ITO 22(2)-2, NAVI MUMBAI

ITA 1085/MUM/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1498 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-06-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2010
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 17-02-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: D SONGATE

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI SMC BENCH BEFORE SHRI T.R.SOOD, AM I.T.A.NO.1085/MUM/2009 - A.Y 2005-06 M/S SONAL ENTERPRISES, B 4, RUNWAL PARK, SION TROMBAY ROAD, CHEMBUR MUMBAI 400 071 PAN NO.AABFS 6534 L VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER 22(2) 2, MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI D.SONGATE. O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, AM: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST C IT[A] S ORDER DATED 10-11-2008 FOR THE A.Y 2005-06. 2. THE APPEAL IN THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON VARIOUS OCCASIONS BUT WAS ADJOURNED AS THE BENCH DID NOT FU NCTION. THE PARTIES WERE INFORMED THROUGH NOTICE BOARD. WHEN TH E MATTER WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING ON 11/6/2010, NEITHER ANY ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT RECEIVED. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERE STED TO PURSUE ITS APPEAL FURTHER. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF TH E I.T.A.T. IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. (38 ITD 320)(DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LA TE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480(MP), THE APPEAL FI LED BY THE 2 ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UNADMITTED FOR WANT OF PRO SECUTION BY THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 18 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010. SD/- (T.R.SOOD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI:18 TH JUNE, 2010. P/-*