SEMPERTRANS INDIA P. LTD, RAIGAD V. DCIT PANVEL CIR PANVEL, RAIGAD

ITA 1087/MUM/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9821 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 3 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-06-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: K
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 03-03-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A MOHAN
• Assessee Lawyers: ABHISHEK TILAK
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

SEMPERTRANS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS . DY. CIT, PANVEL CIRCLE A.Y 2011 - 12 ITA NO. 1087 (TP) NO. 1087/MUM/2016 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL J BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP) NO. 1087/MUM/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011 - 12 ) SEMPERTRANS INDIA PRIVAE LIMITED 21/1, MIDC, AT & POST DHATAV, TAL ROHA, DISTRICT: RAIGAD VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PANVEL CIRCLE, PANVEL, DISTRICT: RAIGAD. PAN AAECS9279E (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: SHRI ABHISHEK TILAK, A.R RESPONDENT BY: SHRI A.MOHAN, CIT D.R DATE OF HEARING: 17.06.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 17 .06.2020 O R D E R PER RAVISH SOOD, JM THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE A.O UNDER SEC. 143(3) R.W.S 144C(13) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT ACT), FOR A.Y. 2011 - 12. THE LD. AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT A.R) FOR THE ASSESSE E AT THE VERY OUTSET OF THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED, THAT AS THE ASSESSEE HAS DECIDED TO OPT FOR THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, THEREFORE, IT MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE CAPTIONED APPEAL. IN SUPPORT OF HIS AFORESAID CLAIM, THE LD. A.R TOOK US THROUGH HIS LETTER DATED 11.06.2020 WHEREIN LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL WAS SOUGHT FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 2. PER CONTRA, THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT D.R) DID NOT OBJECT TO THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE LD. A.R. SEMPERTRANS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS . DY. CIT, PANVEL CIRCLE A.Y 2011 - 12 ITA NO. 1087 (TP) NO. 1087/MUM/2016 2 3. IN THE BACKD ROP OF THE AFORESAID FACTS, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . ORDER PRONOU NCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17 .0 6 .2020 SD/ - SD/ - ( PRAMOD KUMAR ) (RAVISH SOOD) VICE PRESID E NT JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; 17 .0 6 .2020 P.S ROHIT / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 4. / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE . //TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI