SHRI NARESH KUMAR, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-4, JAIPUR

ITA 1089/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5188 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-01-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 18-09-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1089/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 SHRI NARESH KUMAR, 764, SINDHI COLONY, ADARSH NAGAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O. WARD-2(4) JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABAPK 0437 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED. JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 20/01/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28/01/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 18/06/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2013-14. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: APROPOS TO ABOVE CITED SUBJECT, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT OPTED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND IS IN RECEIPT OF FORM 3. THE COPY OF FORM IS ENCLOSED. ITA 1089/JP/2018_ SH. NARESH KUMAR VS ITO 2 THEREFORE, THE APPELLANT HEREBY WITHDRAWS THE APPEAL AND REQUESTED BEFORE YOUR HONOUR TO KINDLY TAKE THE ABOVE INFORMATION/DOCUMENTS ON RECORD AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU SINCERELY YOURS, CA ASHISH KHANDELWAL (COUNSEL OF THE APPELLANT) 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 28/01/2021 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI NARESH KUMAR, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 2(4), JAIPUR. ITA 1089/JP/2018_ SH. NARESH KUMAR VS ITO 3 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1089/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR