Evangeline Jebalina Davamoni, Pondicherry V. ITO, Pondicherry

ITA 1093/CHNY/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 96168 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2015
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 11-05-2015
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A B KOLI

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI , . , BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO S . 1093, 1094 AND 1095/MDS/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR S :200 6 - 0 7, 2007 - 08 AND 2008 - 09 M EVANGELINE JEBALINA DAVAMONI, PROPX. EMERZE, 71 - A, FIRST CROSS ST., KAMALAM NAGAR, REDDIARPALAYAM, PUDUCHERRY 605 001. [PAN: A A DPE6963F ] VS. THE I NCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD I, PONDICHERRY. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A. B. KOLI , J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 05 . 1 0 .201 5 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 07 . 1 0 .201 5 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : THESE THREE APPEALS FILED BY THE SAME ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST DIFFERENT ORDER S OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) , PUDUCHERRY , ALL DATED 30 . 01 .20 15 RELEVANT TO THE AS SESSMENT YEARS 2006 - 07, 2007 - 08 AND 2008 - 09. 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE FOR HEARING ON 18.06.2015 [AD ON RECORD], NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEALS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING . HOWEVER, AT THE REQUEST OF LD. AR VIDE HIS LETTER DATE D I.T.A. NO S.1093 - 1095 /M/ 15 2 10.06.2015 , THE HEARING OF THE APPEALS WAS ADJOURN ED TO 05.08.2015. AGAIN, SINCE NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, THE HEARING THE APPEALS WAS FURTHER ADJOURNED TO 05.10.2015 AND WHEN THE APPEALS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 05.10.2015, NONE APPEA RED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT . HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3 . THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI B ENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), BOTH THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4 . IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 7 TH OCTOBER , 2015 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 07 . 1 0 .201 5 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.