M/s Samasher Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata V. CIT, KOLKATA-1, Kolkata

ITA 1097/KOL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0527 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 20-05-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ASS ESSMENT YEAR DURING COURSE

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH: KOLKATA [ BEFORE SHRI P.K.BANSAL , A . M . & SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH , J.M. ] I.T. A . NO. 1097 /KOL/20 1 4 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 200 8 - 2009 M/S. SAMASHER VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. VS - CIT, KOL - I , KOLKATA ( APPELLANT ) (PAN: A AKCS 9283J ) ( RESPONDENT ) DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEA RING : 17 . 06 .201 5 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : 17 . 06 .201 5 APPEARANCES : F OR THE ASSESSEE : NONE : FOR THE DEPARTM ENT : SHRI A.K.SINGH, CIT, DR O R D E R PER SHRI P.K.BANSAL, A .M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE A GAINST THE ORDER DATED 24 .03 .20 14 OF CIT , KOL - I , KOLKATA FOR THE ASS ESSMENT YEAR 200 8 - 2009 . 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING NOBODY WAS PR ESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, ALTHOUGH T HE NOTICE FOR HEARING ON 17 .06 .2015 WAS SENT BY REGISTERED POST TO THE ASSESSEE VIDE RPAD ON 06.04 .2015 . IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE , IN SPITE OF HAVING RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF HEARING, DID NOT APPEAR AT THE TIME OF HEARING NOR EVEN IT SUBMITTED ANY APPLICATION FOR 2 IT A NO. 1097 /KOL/20 14 M/S. SAMASHER VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. ASSESSMENT YEAR: 200 8 - 09 ADJOURNMENT. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE MATTER. 3. THE LAW AIDS THOSE WHO ARE VIGILANT, NOT THOSE WHO SLEEP UPON THEIR RIGHTS. THIS PRINCIPLE IS EMBODIED IN WELL KNOWN DICTUM, VIGILANTIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT . CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN I NDIA LTD., (38 ITD 320)(DEL), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. 4. SIMILAR VIEW HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (223 ITR 480) WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN HELD AS UNDER: IF TH E PARTY, AT WHOSE INSTANCE THE REFERENCE IS MADE, FAILS TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, OR FAILS IN TAKING STEPS FOR PREPARATION OF THE PAPER BOOKS SO AS TO ENABLE HEARING OF THE REFERENCE, THE COURT IS NOT BOUND TO ANSWER THE REFERENCE. 5. SIMILARLY, HON BLE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF NEW DIWAN OIL MILLS VS. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) RETURNED THE REFERENCE UNANSWERED SINCE THE ASSESSEE REMAINED ABSENT AND THERE WAS NOT ANY ASSISTANCE FROM THE ASSESSEE. 6. THEIR LORDSHIPS OF HON BLE SUPREME COU RT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 - 478) HELD 3 IT A NO. 1097 /KOL/20 14 M/S. SAMASHER VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. ASSESSMENT YEAR: 200 8 - 09 THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME. 7. SO BY RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE VIEW TAKEN IN THE CASES CITED SUPRA, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON - PROSECUTION. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDE R PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT ON 1 7 TH JUNE , 2015 . SD/ - SD/ - ( MAHAVIR SINGH ) (P.K.BANSAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTAN T MEMBER DATED : 1 7 TH JUNE , 2015 TALUKDAR(SR.P.S.) COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1 . M/S. SAMASHER VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. , 35, GANESH CHANDRA AVENUE, 2 ND FLOOR, KOLKATA 700 0 13. 2 CIT, KOL - I , KOLKATA 3 . THE CIT(A), 4. CIT, 5 . DR, TRUE COPY, BY ORDER, ASSTT. REGISTRAR , ITAT, KOLKATA