, D IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 1100/AHD/2017 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14) DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(2), A WING, ROOM NO. 308, 3 RD FLOOR, PRATYAKSH KAR BHAVAN, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD 380015 / VS. M/S. CHEM PROCESS SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. 15, NATRAJ INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SANAND VIRAMGAM HIGHWAY, SANAND, AHMEDABAD - 382170 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AABCC5915A ( APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI VINOD TANWANI, SR.D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MEHUL TALERA, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 28/06/2019 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 28/06/2019 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF IN COME TAX (APPEALS)-1, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 2 8.02.2017 ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.01.2016 PA SSED BY THE ITA NO. 1100/AHD/17 [DCIT VS. M/S. CHEM PROCESS SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2013-14 - 2 - ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UNDER S. 143(3) OF THE INCOM E TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING AY 2013-14. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE REA D AS UNDER:- THAT THE LD. CIT(A) ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN D ELETING THE ADDITION OF RS.1,33,900/- MADE ON ACCOUNT OF DISALLOWANCE OF PA YMENT MADE TO CODEWARE INC AND RS.56,92,500/- PAID TO GRAHAM CORPORATION OF US A BY INVOKING SECTION 9(1)(VII)(C) R.W. EXPLANATION (2) OF THE I.T.ACT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHER E THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.20 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE T AX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. A CCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINA BLE. HOWEVER, ITA NO. 1100/AHD/17 [DCIT VS. M/S. CHEM PROCESS SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2013-14 - 3 - IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCU LAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (PRADIP K UMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 28/06/2019 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- &. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE (. )*+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4. ,- / CIT (A) /. 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7. 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 /5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 28/06/20 19