, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , . !'# ! , % !& BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO.1100/MDS/2014 ( )( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD VI(2), CHENNAI - 600 034. V. SHRI DEEPAK KUMAR (HUF), NO.19, NEW SOLAIAPPAN STREET, OLD WASHERMENPET, CHENNAI - 600 021. PAN : AADHD 9182 K (+,/ APPELLANT) (-.+,/ RESPONDENT) +, / 0 / APPELLANT BY : SH. A.B. KOLI, JCIT -.+, / 0 / RESPONDENT BY : SH. G. ALEXANDER, ADVOCATE 1 / 2% / DATE OF HEARING : 08.02.2016 3') / 2% / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08.02.2016 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-II, CHENNA I, DATED 27.12.2013 AND PERTAINS TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. ON HEARING THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, WE FIND THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS CASE IS LESS THAN ` 10 LAKHS. THE CBDT IN 2 I.T.A. NO.1100/MDS/14 ITS CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015 INSTRUCTED ITS OFFICERS TO WITHDRAW ALL THE APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE ITAT WH ERE THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN ` 10 LAKHS. THIS TRIBUNAL IS OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THIS CIRCULAR OF CBDT IS BINDING ON TH E OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT. THEREFORE, THE REVENUE CANNOT PROCEED FURTHER IN THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THIS APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 8 TH FEBRUARY, 2016 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- (. !'# ! ) ( . . . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) (N.R.S. GANESAN) % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, 5 /DATED, THE 8 TH FEBRUARY, 2016. KRI. / -267 87)2 /COPY TO: 1. +, /APPELLANT 2. -.+, /RESPONDENT 3. 1 92 () /CIT(A) 4. 1 92 /CIT, 5. 7: -2 /DR 6. ;( < /GF.