, . . , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD , , BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.1106/AHD/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 ) DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 AAYAKAR BHAVAN RACE COURSE CIRCLE BARODA / VS. M/S.SHUBHAM ASSOCIATES 1-2, VISHRANTI DARSHAN PARK SOCIETY VIP ROAD KARELIBAUG BARODA-390 018 # ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : ABUFS 3697 L ( #& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '#& / RESPONDENT ) #&( / APPELLANT BY : SHRI SAURABH SINGH, SR.DR '#&)( / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PARIN SHAH, AR *+), / DATE OF HEARING 21/03/2018 -./0), / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 23/ 03 /2018 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANC E OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-12, AHMEDABAD [CIT(A) IN SHORT] DATED 02/12/2015 RELEVANT TO ASS ESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2011-12. ITA NO.1106/AHD /2016 DCIT VS. M/S.SHUBHAM ASSOCIATES ASST.YEAR 2011-12 - 2 - 2. THE GROUND OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE READ S AS UNDER:- ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD.CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AS WELL AS FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE BY DELETING THE PENALTY U/S.271AAA BY AMOUNTING TO RS. 10,00,000/-, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT FULFILL ED THE CONDITION (II) LAY DOWN IN PENALTY U/S.271AAA, IN RESPECT TO SUBSTANTI ATES THE MANNER IN WHICH THE UNDISCLOSED INCOME WAS DERIVED DURING THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT & PENALTY PROCEEDINGS. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HIT BY CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10/12/2015. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULA R, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A ME ASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS RS.10 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, T HE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUE RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO B E NOT EXCEEDING RS.10 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LD.DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED THE AP PLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPL ICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IN ANY MANNER. ITA NO.1106/AHD /2016 DCIT VS. M/S.SHUBHAM ASSOCIATES ASST.YEAR 2011-12 - 3 - 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DIS MISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 23 / 0 3 /201 8 SD/- SD/- ( ) ( ) ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 23/ 03 /2018 4 ..*,.*../ T.C. NAIR, SR. PS !'#' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. #& / THE APPELLANT 2. '#& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 567, 8, / CONCERNED CIT 4. 8, ( ) / THE CIT(A)-12, AHMEDABAD 5. 9:;,*67 , 670 , 5 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. ;<+ / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, '9 ,, //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION .. 21.3.18 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 21.3.18 3. OTHER MEMBER 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S.. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S.23.3.18 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 23.3.18 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER