IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘ A-FRIDAY’ : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTI JIT DEY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 111/Del/2019 Assessmen t Year : 2015-16 KUMKUM JAIN, 293, JAGRITI ENCLAVE, NEAR ANAND VIHAR, NEW DELHI – 110 092 (PAN: ABSPJ1342D) Vs. ITO, WARD 55(1), NEW DELHI (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by : Sh. Mrinal Kumar Das, Sr. DR. Date of hearing : 23.09.2022 Date of pronouncement : 23.09.2022 ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of L earned CIT(A)-19, New Delhi. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, assessee vide her letter dated 13.9.2022 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by her as she had opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears 2 for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. It was further mentioned in the aforesaid letter dated 13.9.2022 that the designated authority vide its order dated 15.12,.2020 determined the amount of Rs. -74332/- whic h was refundable to her. Accordingly, she has not paid any amount to the income tax authority and filed a copy of Form No. 5 dated 21.09.2021 received from the PCIT, Delhi -20, New Delhi. 3. Learned Senior DR has no objection. 4. In view of the above, we acc ept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Above decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 23 rd September, 2022. SD/- SD/- (G.S. PANNU) (SAKTIJIT DEY) PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER SRB Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant. 2. Respondent. 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT 3 Assistant R egistrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches