The ACIT, Circle-5, Surat V. M/s. Starlite Securities, Surat

ITA 1113/AHD/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1253 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 year(s) 2 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-06-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2016
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 09-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DINESH SINGH
• Assessee Lawyers: J P SHAH
• Keywords: Business income; Retrospective amendment; Tax effect

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.1113/AHD/2010 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-2007 ACIT, CIR.5 SURAT. VS M/S.STARLITE SECURITIES GARDEN MILLS COMPLEX SAHARA GATE SURAT. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI DINESH SINGH, SR.DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI J.P. SHAH / DATE OF HEARING : 22/06/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22/06/2016 $%/ O R D E R THE REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINS T THE ORDER OF THE LD.CIT(A)-IV, SURAT DATED 30.12.2009 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2006-2007. 2. SOLITARY GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE LD .CIT(A) IS ERRED IN DELETING ADDITION OF RS.29,84,583/- AS STCG INSTEAD OF BUSINESS INCOME AS ASSESSED BY THE AO. 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE S UBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL IS BELOW RS.10 LAKHS, AND THE REFORE, APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT ADMISSIBLE, IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015. BY VIRTUE OF THIS INSTRUCTION, THE BOA RD HAS RESTRAINED THE DEPARTMENT NOT TO FILE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL W HERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.10 LAKHS, AND THEREFORE, APPEAL OF THE REV ENUE LIABLE TO BE ITA NO.1113/AHD/2010 2 DISMISSED IN LIMINE . THE LD.DR COULD NOT CONTROVERT TO THIS SUBMISSIO N OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. 4. WE FIND THAT THE REVENUE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL ON 9.04.2010. ON 10.12.2015 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING NO. 21/2015 PROHIBITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL TO THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFEC T BY VIRTUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. THE INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THEREBY, THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRE SENT CASE, ASSESSED INCOME COMPUTED BY THE AO IS RS.31,17,939/-. THE ADDITION CONTESTED BY THE REVENUE IS OF RS.29,84,583/- WHICH WAS DELETED BY T HE LD.CIT(A). THE TAX EFFECT ON THIS DISPUTED ADDITION WOULD BE LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED BEING TREAT ED TO BE FILED IN VIOLATION OF CBDT INSTRUCTIONS. IT IS FURTHER OBSERVED THAT SINCE, WHILE HEARING THE APPEAL, SUCH FACTORS COULD NOT BE CROSS-VERIFIED, T HEREFORE, IN CASE, ON RE- VERIFICATION AT THE END OF THE AO, IT CAME TO THE N OTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE OR IT FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PRO VIDED IN THE INSTRUCTION, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHI N LIMITATION PRESCRIBED UNDER THE LAW. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS DISMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 22 ND JUNE, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 22/06/2016