Smt. Manpreet Kaur, Mohali V. ITO Ward 6(3), Mohali

ITA 1137/CHANDI/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8031 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-08-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2020
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 14-08-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ARVIND SUDARSHAN J

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BE NCH SMC CHANDIGARH !', # BEFORE: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JM ./ ITA NO. 1137/CHD/2019 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 SMT. MANPREET KAUR, VILLAGE MANAKMAJRA, P.O. SOHANA, MOHALI. VS THE ITO, WARD 6(3), MOHALI. ./ PAN NO: AZJPK2580M / APPELLANT / RESPONDENT ! ' / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI PARIKSHIT AGGARWAL, C.A. # ! ' / REVENUE BY : SHRI ARVIND SUDARSHAN, JCIT-DR $ % ! &/ DATE OF HEARING : 19.08.2020 '()* ! &/ D ATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20.08.2020 HEARING CONDUCTED VIA WEBEX $%/ ORDER T HE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE WH EREIN THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ORDER DATED 28/06/2019 OF CIT(A) CHANDIGARH PERTAINING TO 201011 ASSESSMENT YEAR ON VARIOUS GR OUNDS IS ASSAILED BY THE ASSESSEE. 2. BOTH THE PARTIES WERE PRESENT VIA WEBEX. MR. P. AGGARWAL C.A AND LEARNED SR. DR MR.A. SUDARSHAN APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE AND THE REVENUE RESPECTIVELY. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING LD. AR INVITED ATTENTION TO THE APPLICATION FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. RELYIN G ON THE SAME, IT WAS SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS GONE FOR SETTLE MENT UNDER THE 'VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY ITA-1137/CHD/2019 A.Y. 2010-11 PAGE 2 PRINCIPAL CIT BY WAY OF FORM NO. 3 FILED WAS ALSO RELIED UPON. ACCORDINGLY, IT WAS HIS LIMITED PRAYER THAT THE APP EAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES MAY BE DISMISSED AS W ITHDRAWN. 4. MR. A. SUDARSHAN APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE REVE NUE, ON A PERUSAL OF THE RECORD SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS NO OBJE CTION TO THE SAID PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE. 5. I HAVE THE HEARD THE SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MA TERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IN THE LIGHT OF THE PRAYER OF THE PARTIES, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SAID ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF IN THE VIR TUAL COURT. 6. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISM ISSED AS WITHDRAWN ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 20 TH AUGUST,2020. SD/- ( !' ) (DIVA SINGH) # / JUDICIAL MEMBER ' ( (+ ! ,- .- / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT -3. $ / / CIT 4. $ / ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. -01 2 , & 2 , 34516 / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. 15 7% / GUARD FILE (+ $ / BY ORDER 8 # / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR