IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH SMC BEFORE SHRI D. K. TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO.1139 / AHD/2008 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05) VASHISTHBHAI K PATEL, 4, BAPUKRIPA SOCIETY, SUBHASH CHOWK, GURKUL, AHMEDABAD VS. ITO WARD 6(2), AHMEDABAD PAN/GIR NO. :AHBPP9878P (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI Y C SURTI, DR O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN PREFERRED AGA INST THE ORDER DATED 30.01.2008 OF CIT(A) XI, AHMEDABAD, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. IN THIS APPEAL, A DEFECTIVE MEMO WAS ISSUED BY THE REGISTRY POINTING OUT THE FOLLOWING DEFECTS: I) LESS APPEAL FEE OF RS.1,000/- II) ORIGINAL CHALLANS NOT RECEIVED, III) ORIGINAL GROUNDS OF APPEAL BEFORE ITAT NOT FILED. 2. DESPITE SEVERAL REMINDERS, NO COMPLIANCE HAS BEE N MADE BY THE ASSESSEE. SINCE NEITHER THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL HAVE BEEN MENTIONED IN THE MEMO OF APPEAL NOR REQUISITE FEE HAS BEEN PAID BY T HE ASSESSEE, THE I.T.A.NO1139/AHD/2008. 2 APPEAL CANNOT BE ADMITTED FOR HEARING AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED AS UNADMITTED. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DIS MISSED. 4. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 02 ND JUNE, 2011. SD./- (D.K.TYAGI) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED :02 ND JUNE, 2011 SP COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPLICANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE LD. CIT (APPEALS) 5. THE DR, AHMEDABAD 6. THE GUARD FILE 1. DATE OF DICTATION 2/6/11 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 2/6/11 OTHER MEMBER 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. P .S./P.S. 3/6/11 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ALREADY PRONOUNCED ON 2/6/11 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. P.S./P.S. 3/6/11 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 3/6/11 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK .. 8. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER . 9. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER. ..