, - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH D BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 1142/AHD/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13 SHRI HARI ISNA CHAUDHARY C-376/77, ANANDBAUG SOCIETY SUSEN TARSALI ROAD MAKARPURA VADODARA 390 010. PAN : ABDPC 3398 M VS ITO, WARD-1(2)(1) VADODARA. / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : DR.RAJESH MEENA, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 14/03/2019 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14/03/2019 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST ORDER OF T HE LD.CIT(A)-5, VADODARA DATED 22.1.20197 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2012-13 CHALLENGING ADDITION UNDER SECTION 69A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1 961. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 5.1.2018 AND 25.1.2019 NONE APPEARE D ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. , ACCORDINGLY HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 14 .3.2019. ON THIS DATE ALSO NONE APPEARED. ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY ADJ OURNMENT APPLICATION NOR INTIMATED ABOUT REASONS FOR HIS NON-APPEARANCE IN THE MATTER. IN VIEW OF THIS, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THEREFO RE, APPEAL OF THE ITA NO.1142 /AHD/2017 - 2 - ASSESSEE STAND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION FO LLOWING DECISION OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PV T. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI). 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14 TH MARCH, 2019. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED, 14/03/2019