M/s Ryatar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit, Bagalkot V. CIT, Belgaum

ITA 1142/BANG/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8659 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-02-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2017
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 10-08-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJASHEKAR

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH B, BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAYPAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1142(BANG.)/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2010-11) M/S RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, TIMMPUR, TALUK MUDHOL, DT. BAGALKOT APPELLANT VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BELAGAVI RESPOND ENT DATE OF HEARING : 02-02-2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02-0 2-2016 APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RAJASHEKAR, ADDL.CIT O R D E R PER SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, AM; THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER OF CIT(A), BELAGAVI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 . 2. IN THIS CASE, THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS DULY SE RVED ON THE ASSESSEE AND THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS ON RECOR D. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING TODAY I.E 02-02-2016, N ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTIC E. THEREFORE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURS UE ITS APPEAL, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT ITA NO.1142(B)15 2 VS M/S MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD., (38 ITD 320) T HE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 2 ND FEBRUARY, 2016. SD/- SD/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (ABRAHAM P GEORGE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOU NTANT MEMBER PLACE: BANGALORE DATED: 02-02-2016 AM* COPY TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE REVENUE 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR 6. GF (BLORE) BY ORDER AR, ITAT, BANGALORE