, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , A BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , , BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1142/CHNY/2019 ( [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) SHRI A. RANJETH, NO.237, VKG HOUSE, ARUNACHALA NAGAR, KARUR 639 004. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, KARUR. PAN: AKYPR7445L ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) & ./ I.T.A.NO.1143/CHNY/2019 ( [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) SHRI V.K. RAJENDRAN, NO.232, ARUNACHALA NAGAR, RAMAGOUNDANUR, KARUR 639 004. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, KARUR. PAN: AANPR4992B ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANTS BY : SHRI N. QUADIR HOSEYN, ADVOCATE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AR.V. SREENIVASAN, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 30.01.2020 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30.01.2020 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER : BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE ORDERS OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHY DATED 18.03.2019 PASSED U/S.263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. 2 ITA NOS.1142 & 1143/CHNY/2019 2. WHEN THE APPEALS ARE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING SHRI N. QUADIR HOSEYN, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE WAS INSTRUCTED BY BOTH THE ASSESSEES TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS. THE LD.COUNSEL HAS ALSO MADE AN ENDORSEMENT TO THAT EFFECT IN THE APPEAL FOLDERS. 3. WE HEARD SHRI AR.V. SREENIVASAN, THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE ALSO. THE LD.DR HAS NO OBJECTION TO DISMISS THE APPEALS AS NOT PRESSED. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEES STAND DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 30 TH JANUARY, 2020 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ) (RAMIT KOCHAR) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . . . ) (N.R.S. GANESAN) /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, /DATED, THE 30 TH JANUARY, 2020. RSR /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANTS 2. /RESPONDENT 3. ( )/CIT(A) 4. /CIT 5. /DR 6. [ /GF