Sh. Jaswinder Singh, Bathinda V. The Income Tax Officer, Bathinda

ITA 115/ASR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8560 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-03-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 18-02-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.115(Asr)/2016 Assessment year:2011-12 PAN:AENPS5926C Sh. Jaswinder Singh vs. Income Tax Officer, 161, Royal Enclave, Ward II(1), Bathinda. Bathinda. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Sh. Tarsem Lal, DR Date of hearing: 29/03/2016 Date of pronouncement: 29/03/2016 ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, JM This is the assessee’s appeal for the assessment year 2011-12, against the order, dated 26.11.2015, passed by the ld. CIT(A), Bathinda. 2. Notice of hearing for today, i.e., 29.03.2016 was issued to the assessee by RPAD on 11.03.2016. As per record, the same has not returned unserved. However, at the time of hearing, neither the assessee, nor his authorized representative appeared, nor any application for adjournment was filed. 3. In view the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of the present appeal and the same is liable to be dismissed on this ground itself. Therefore, considering the facts and keeping in mind the provisions of Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax ITA No.115(Asr)/2016 Asstt. Year: 2011-12 2 (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, as were considered in the case of CIT Vs. Multiplan India Ltd. reported in 38 ITD 320(Del.), we treat this appeal as un-admitted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. The assessee, if so advised, shall be free to move this Tribunal praying for recalling of this order and explaining the reasons for non-compliance, etc. and if the Bench is so satisfied about the reasons, etc., this order shall be recalled. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order pronounced in the open court on 29/03/ 2016. Sd/- Sd/- (T.S. KAPOOR) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 29/03/2016 Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. The Assessee: Sh. Jaswinder Singh, Bathinda 2. The ITO Ward II(1), Bathinda. 3. The CIT(A), Bathinda. 4. The CIT, Bathinda. 5. The SR DR, ITAT, Amritsar. True copy By order (Assistant Registrar) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench: Amritsar.