Late Shri Kishan Lal, Noida V. ITO, Noida

ITA 1150/DEL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: 115020114 RSA 2011
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-11-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2017
• Assessment Year: 1997-1998
• Appeal Filed On: 03-03-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRATIMA KAUSHIK

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI AND SHRI B.C. MEENA ITA NO. 1150/DEL/2011 ASSTT. YR: 1997-98 LATE SHRI KISHAN LAL S/O LATE SHRI TULSI RAM VS. I NCOME-TAX OFFICER, R/O VILLAGE CHALLERA, SECTOR-44, WARD-2, NOIDA. NOIDA, (UP). PAN/GIR NO. ABHPL2096B (APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. PRATIMA KAUSHIK DR O R D E R PER R.P. TOLANI, J.M : THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL AGAINST CIT(A)S ORDER DATED 29-12-2010 RELATING TO A.Y. 1997-98. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE HEARING FIXED FOR 8-11- 2011 DESPITE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF DATE OF HEARING AS IS APPARENT FROM ORDER SHEET DATED 12-9-2011 WHEN THE ASSESSEE HAD FILED PAPER BOOK AN D HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 8-11- 2011 AND BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INTIMATED OF THE NEX T DATE FIXED IN OPEN COURT. EVEN NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING HAS BEEN RECEIVE D. IT GIVES AN IMPRESSION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, PLACI NG RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF DECISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL .); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 08-11-2011. SD/- SD/- ( B.C. MEENA ) ( R.P. TOLANI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 08-11-2011. MP COPY TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR