IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. C.M. GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUTANT MEMBER ITA No.1151/Del/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 ITO Ward- 1 Sonipat Vs. Brij Pal Tyagi Gali No.6, Jeevan Vihar, Devru Road, Sonipat PAN No.ACLPT0124B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Kanav Bali, Sr. DR Respondent by Sh. Brij Pal Tyagi, Assessee in person Date of hearing: 02/11/2022 Date of Pronouncement: 02/11/2022 ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA AM: This appeal filed by the revenue is preferred against the order of the CIT(A), Rohtak dated 13.01.2020 for A.Y. 2011-12. 2. The grievance of the revenue show that the tax effect would be less than Rs. 50 lakhs, therefore, this appeal is not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. 3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the revenue to approach the Tribunal as per the provisions of law, should it feel that the tax effect is more than Rs. 50 lakhs. 2 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 02.11.2022. Sd/- Sd/- (C.M. GARG) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER *NEHA, Sr. Private Secretary Date:-02.11.2022 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI