IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI A. L. GEHLOT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 116/AGRA/2010 ASST. YEAR : 2006-07 SHRI RAVI AVINASH JOSHI, VS. COMMISSIONER OF RADHA APPARTMENT, INCOME-TAX, GWALIOR. BEHIND SHRI RAM PLACE BADA, LASHKAR, GWALIOR. (PAN : AGCPJ 2017 J) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI WASEEM ARSHAD, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 19.03.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19.03.2012 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, GWALIOR U/S. 263 OF THE I.T. ACT DAT ED 15.03.2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE T IME OF HEARING OF APPEAL DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. HONBLE SUPRE ME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, 118 ITR 461(SC) OBS ERVED THAT PREFERRING AN ITA NO. 116/AGRA/2010 2 APPEAL MEANS EFFECTIVELY PURSUING IT. HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 48 0(MP) DISMISSED THE REFERENCE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT TAKING NECE SSARY STEPS. SIMILAR VIEW IS TAKEN BY ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS, THEREFOR E, DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19.03.2012. SD/- SD/- (A.L. GEHLOT) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER *AKS/- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A), CONCERNED BY ORDER 4. CIT, CONCERNED 5. DR, ITAT, AGRA 6. GUARD FILE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR TRUE COPY